Epstein Secrets

n Hecker re: the know if you have any edits or concerns. Once I have sign-off, or let me know if I should use a request for information related to Epstein. Please let me I'll send to Robbie Kaplan (by mail and at different address). assuming there are not huge changes to be made here, I think the let

Epstein-Related Touhy Requests (USANYS) I spoke to about continuing to use as the POC to outsiders for Touh requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you , please give a call. FWIW, following is a markup of a "please give us a Touhy statement" email that I have used in the past. antici

(USANYS)" To: ' Cc: (USANYS)" Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Sat, 04 Jan

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Delfiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

elated Touhy Requests All, (USANYS) ; (USANYS) Please find attached an initial letter to Kaplan Hecker re: the request for information related to Epstein. Please let me know if you have any edits or concerns. Once I have sign-off, I'll send to Robbie Kaplan (by mail and at or let me know if I should

Related Touhy Requests <> >; (USANYS) I spoke to about continuing to use as the POC to outsiders for Touh requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you .) , please give a call. FWIW, following is a markup of a "please give us a Touhy statement" email that I have used in the past. an

Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Sat, 04 Jan

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Deyiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 478

ated Touhy Requests All, (USANYS) <a; (USANYS) Please find attached an initial letter to Kaplan Hecker re: the request for information related to Epstein. Please let me know if you have any edits or concerns. Once I have sign-off, I'll send to Robbie Kaplan (by mail and at or let me know if I should

elated Touhy Requests >; (USANYS) < E> I spoke to about continuing to use as the POC to outsiders for Touh requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you .) , please give a call. FWIW, following is a markup of a "please give us a Touhy statement" email that I have used in the past. an

From: ' To: ' (USANYS)" ctl Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Date: Mon, 06 Jan

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. De!finer, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

d to loop in everybody on the case on the criminal side, you'll be the point person for requests from civil plaintiffs / victims in connection with Epstein lawsuits, and we'll work with you on those requests given our knowledge of the relevant facts and materials. In terms of this first question from t

Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2020 10:01 To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Alex, Steven, ; Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) I spoke to Jeffrey 0 about continuing to use Steven as the POC to outsiders for Touhy requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you Steven!) Alex, ple

ochevar, Steven (USANYS) I spoke to Jeffrey 0 about continuing to use Steven as the POC to outsiders for Touhy requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you Steven!) Alex, please give Steven a call. Steven, FWIW, following is a markup of a "please give us a Touhy statement" email that I have

thority to compel production of such files without the EFTA00088127 federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. De!finer, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

d to loop in everybody on the case on the criminal side, you'll be the point person for requests from civil plaintiffs / victims in connection with Epstein lawsuits, and we'll work with you on those requests given our knowledge of the relevant facts and materials. In terms of this first question from t

nt: Thursday, January 02, 2020 10:01 To: Subject: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests > Alex, Steven, • Kochevar, Steven (USANYS) I spoke to Jeffrey 0 about continuing to use Steven as the POC to outsiders for Touhy requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you Steven!) Alex, ple

ochevar, Steven (USANYS) I spoke to Jeffrey 0 about continuing to use Steven as the POC to outsiders for Touhy requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you Steven!) Alex, please give Steven a call. Steven, FWIW, following is a markup of a "please give us a Touhy statement" email that I have

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Delfiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

ew York Times has filed the attached FOIA complaint challenging BOP's response (or lack thereof) to the Times's FOIA requests for records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I've contacted to see who at BOP will be handling this. Our Answer date is currently March 4, 2020. Please let me know if you have any particular

d to loop in everybody on the case on the criminal side, you'll be the point person for requests from civil plaintiffs / victims in connection with Epstein lawsuits, and we'll work with you on those requests given our knowledge of the relevant facts and materials. In terms of this first question from t

the Times's FOIA requests for records related to Jeffrey Epstein. I've contacted to see who at BOP will b

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Delfiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 47

d to loop in everybody on the case on the criminal side, you'll be the point person for requests from civil plaintiffs / victims in connection with Epstein lawsuits, and we'll work with you on those requests given our knowledge of the relevant facts and materials. In terms of this first question from t

rey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests c E> I spoke to about continuing to use as the POC to outsiders for Touh requests for information relating to Jeffrey Epstein. (Thank you !) , please give a call. FWIW, following is a markup of a "please give us a Touhy statement" email that I have used in the past. an

SANYS) 4:Me )1 (USANYS) (USANYS) Subject: RE: Jeffrey Epstein-Related Touhy Requests Thanks for talkin

are without authority to compel production of such files without the federal government's consent"); People v. Carbonaro, 427 N.Y.S.2d 701, 702-03 (Kings Co. Sup. Ct. 1980) (quashing subpoena served on federal employee where Department of Justice ordered him not to comply); Jacoby v. Deyiner, 51 N.Y.S.2d 478