Epstein Secrets

ve Order, which specifically only included emails relating to news reporters or the media. On May 7, 2012, Judge Crow entered an Order on Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant Bradley Edwards and for Sanctions stating, "Bradley Edwards shall within 30 days of the date

offender who has been sued by dozens of victims for sexual abuse of children. In the course of the above-captioned bankruptcy proceedings, in 2010, Epstein served a broad subpoena attempting to secure thousands of attorney communications by Fanner Jaffe attorney Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., who while prev

E OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT,

ding attorney client privilege and work product privilege and remain on the privilege log. RECENT EVENTS 20. On November 1, 2017, the law firm of Link & Rockenbach, P.A. entered a Notice of Appearance in the Epstein lawsuit, pending before Judge Donald Hafele (the successor to Judge Crow). As it has evolved, Epstein

RDS' SUMMARY OF DAMAGES Bradley J. Edwards, by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing, hereby files this Summary of Damages, and states as follows: INTRODU

wler White, are required to show cause as to why they should be not be held in contempt of Court. The evidentiary hearing concerns Fowler White and Epstein's apparent violation of this Court's order dated November 30, 2010 [DE 1194], which governed the process by which approximately 27,000 documents, p

Court's Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Should Not Be Held in Contempt and Sched

on of the Court's order by keeping a bates numbered CD in its files, which was later turned over the Epstein's trial counsel in the Epstein lawsuit, Link & Rockenbach, P.A. At least some of those improperly retained documents were then turned over to Epstein. Fowler White and Epstein's apparent violation of the Court's

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., Defendants. SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION (Mail in Sub

COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein) Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et al., Defendants. SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION (Mail in Subpoena) THE STATE OF FLORI

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (Severed Claim; Epstein v. Rothstein)

tes of America do United States Attorney's Office 500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at Link & Rockenbach, P.A., 1555 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, Suite 930, West Palm Beach, Florida, on November 16, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. and to have with you at that time and pla