Epstein Secrets

Subject MORE DOCUMENTS re Epstein As you know, Mr. Epstein's counsel served upon the Trustee a refined email

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTErN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant(s). IN THE CIRCU

ecords Custodian of Trustee Herbert Stettin, and Motion for Appointment of Robert Carney as Special Master and states the following: 1. Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein has directed two discovery requests to the Trustee. This motion is directed at the second discovery request. 2. Epstein claims that he served his

ng: 1. Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein has directed two discovery requests to the Trustee. This motion is directed at the second discovery request. 2. Epstein claims that he served his second Trustee discovery request, a Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum of Records Custodian of RRA Bankruptcy Trustee Herber

ts which are the supposed subject of his request. 9. The parties previously agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney as a special master before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to address the issues that arose in connection with the first discovery request. 10. The parties have agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney a

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO. 4D18-0762 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, RECEIVED, 3/13/2018 5:01 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Petitioner, -VS- SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individ

lief Requested As the Court is aware from other pleadings in this matter, this case involves an alleged serial sex offender, Jeffrey Epstein. Among Epstein's many victims were three then-minor girls, E.W., and Jane Doe. The victims are currently attempting to secure return to the trial court of sensit

iction to award sanctions in favor of Farmer, Brad Edwards or his client. Exhibit B at 2 (emphasis added). In spite of that clear order from Judge Ray, Epstein's lawyers appear to have flagrantly disregarded the judge's clear instructions by creating a separate disk containing all the confidential material

OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO. 4D18-0762 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, RECEIVED, 3/13/2018 5:01 PM, Clerk, Fou

ral bankruptcy court order. See Supplement to Edwards' Mot. to Strike, Exhibit B at pp. 1-3. In particular, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Raymond B. Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of Florida entered an explicit order that Epstein's attorneys (at the Fowler White law firm) would merely print out thousa

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and M., individually, Defendant(s). IN THE CIRCUIT COURT O

ng: 1. Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein has directed two discovery requests to the Trustee. This motion is directed at the second discovery request. 2. Epstein claims that he served his second Trustee discovery request, a Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum of Records Custodian of RRA Bankruptcy Trustee Herber

#291874/mep JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, in

Subject: MORE DOCUMENTS re Epstein As you know, Mr. Epstein's counsel served upon the Trustee a refined email

ts which are the supposed subject of his request. 9. The parties previously agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney as a special master before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to address the issues that arose in connection with the first discovery request. 10. The parties have agreed to the appointment of Robert Carney a

UIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION AG CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. PLAINTIFF'

aintiffs. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT EDWARDS' RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein ("Plaintiff" or "Epstein"), hereby files the following Response in Opposition to Defendant Bradley J. Edwards' ("Edwards") Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") an

SE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

the place of the now-defunct firm's management since before this case was filed. The subpoena resulted in proceedings before Honorable Judge Ray of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, who appointed a Special Master. In response to several Orders entered by Judge Ray, Edwards filed a I59-page privilege log claiming that over 200