Epstein Secrets

nking Support; GrarnIns, Margaret M Sublime RE JEFFREY EPSTEIN - please advise On tuskless CC Eli Janet

his means that the underwriting is done based on Mr. Epstein's credit bureau and credit worthiness. Botn he an

advise on business CC a•lia. Dodle, Today we had a discussion watt the office of Jeffrey Epstein. All parties an agree that the credit exposure of Jeffrey Epstein will not be increased, so the Epstein office has agreed to reallocate the credit limits on the variots Ws. Today I will submit a request to decrease

, 2013 1 22 PM To: Young, Janet E Co: Ne son, Justin D; PB-Sorvice13113, Travers, Scott 6; GM Banking Support; GrarnIns, Margaret M Sublime RE JEFFREY EPSTEIN - please advise On tuskless CC Eli Janet. With the additional context I wig remain with my original suggestion of the Ink Sikes Cant For convenienc

ious incarnation In the email chain. The Ink Plus Is available in Joint and Several Liability. This means that the underwriting is done based on Mr. Epstein's credit bureau and credit worthiness. Botn he and the business are finandalh; liable, The additional line will not report to his personal bureau un

ns and solut ons sheets are available on the Credh Card Intranet Page. Thank you - From: Young, Janet E Sent: Friday, March 22, 201312:43 PM To; Rawlings, Mk Cc: Nelson, Tustin 0; PB-Service1318; Travers, Scott 8; GWI4 Blinking Summit; Gra:tars, Margaret M Subject: RE: JEFFREY EPSTEIN • Please advise

Form-pdf zip Dodie and Kenny, Thank you for help on this request. Dob, Pitase see the two Executive Endorsements we discussed that are under the Jeffrey Epstein relationship and proceed with the requested change and issue of the credit cardss. Best Regards, Janet Young Janet E. Youngl Vice President I Pri

orsements we discussed that are under the Jeffrey Epstein relationship and proceed with the requested chan

tive Endorsements we discussed that are under the Jeffrey Epstein relationship and proceed with the reques

Apr•11I-2013 0:9:05 AM JPMergan Chase 30.604-96190 28535 Young, Janet E To: Rawlings, Podia; Mallek, Kenneth A: Bogart, Deborah A Cc: PB-Service1310: Travel), Scott Eh Merlin Jr, Philip R.; GrarnalS, Margaret M; Smith, Tad C; Frenc

rgan I PAILS ID # 832072 - 5(10Stantcn Christiana Road, Newark (>7. 19713 P F Alternate contacts: Gina Magllocod and Jason Grosse I T: F: From: Rawlings, Dodie Sent Wednesday, April 03, 2013 5:59 PM To: Mallet, Kenneth A; Young, tenet E CC PB-SeNtre1318; TYavers, Scott B; Misfits 3r, Philp K.; Gran

Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently, on April 16, 2

rational juror, after hearing the evidence, could find that the question called for the names of minors that the defendant interacted with at any of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, that the defendant answered that she was aware of no such minors other than , and therefore that her answer was false. And even if the d

out whether the defendant brought women to Epstein, which the defendant resisted by observing that she hired "people across the board" to "work for Jeffrey." (Id. at 245:7-18). counsel asked whether any minors worked as exercise instructors or masseuses at Epstein's home, and the defendant testified t

sex toys or devices used in sexual activities in Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house? A. No. not that I recall. q

urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale

, 2016 meeting (the "Daily News Article" or the "Article").35 The Article stated, among other things, that defense attorneys representing victims of Epstein and Maxwell "urged" the USAO-SDNY to "open an investigation of the duo" during that meeting. Citing two anonymous sources, the Article described th

rational juror, after hearing the evidence, could find that the question called for the names of minors that the defendant interacted with at any of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, that the defendant answered that she was aware of no such minors other than and therefore that her answer was false. And even if the def

out whether the defendant brought women to Epstein, which the defendant resisted by observing that she hired "people across the board" to "work for Jeffrey." (Id. at 245:7-18). 'ounsel asked whether any minors worked as exercise instructors or masseuses at Epstein's home, and the defendant testified t

, the following colloquy occurred: When you and Mr. Epstein were engaged in sexual activity that included th

urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale

Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently, on April 16, 2

rational juror, after hearing the evidence, could find that the question called for the names of minors that the defendant interacted with at any of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, that the defendant answered that she was aware of no such minors other than Giuffre, and therefore that her answer was false. And even i

out whether the defendant brought women to Epstein, which the defendant resisted by observing that she hired "people across the board" to "work for Jeffrey." (Id. at 245:7-18). Giuffre's counsel asked whether any minors worked as exercise instructors or masseuses at Epstein's home, and the defendant te

e following colloquy occurred: Er. When you and Mr. Epstein were engaged in sexual activity that included th

urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale

Order On or about April 9, 2019, the Government advised Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently, on April 16, 2

rational juror, after hearing the evidence, could find that the question called for the names of minors that the defendant interacted with at any of Jeffrey Epstein's properties, that the defendant answered that she was aware of no such minors other than Giuffre, and therefore that her answer was false. And even i

out whether the defendant brought women to Epstein, which the defendant resisted by observing that she hired "people across the board" to "work for Jeffrey." (Id. at 245:7-18). Giuffre's counsel asked whether any minors worked as exercise instructors or masseuses at Epstein's home, and the defendant te

e following colloquy occurred: Er. When you and Mr. Epstein were engaged in sexual activity that included th

urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale

2016 meeting (the "Daily News Article" or the "Article") .36 The Article stated, among other things, that defense attorneys representing victims of Epstein and the defendant "urged" the USAO-SDNY to "open an investigation of the duo" during that meeting. Citing two anonymous sources, the Article descri

underage girls that the defendant met and brought to Epstein. Specifically: Q. Can you list for me all the girls that you have met and brought to Jeffrey Epstein's house that were under the age of 18? MR. PAGLIUCA: Objection to the form and foundation. A. I could only recall my family members that were there a

out whether the defendant brought women to Epstein, which the defendant resisted by observing that she hired "people across the board" to "work for Jeffrey." (Id. at 245:7-18). Giuffre's counsel asked whether any minors worked as exercise instructors or masseuses at Epstein's home, and the defendant te

Q. Were you ever involved in sexual activities in Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house that included the use of sex

urden of establishing that his own Fourth Amendment rights were violated by the challenged search or seizure." Rakas, 439 U.S. at 130, n.1; see also Rawlings v. Kentucky, 448 U.S. 98, 104 (1980). Under the third party doctrine, the Fourth Amendment "does not prohibit the obtaining of information reveale

Chas?. 301-µ34-5580 20; P. From: Rawlings, Dodie Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:43 PM To: Nelson, Justin D Cc Young, Janet E Subject: RE: JEFFREY EPS MIN HI Justin, Based on my review: For your 3 Consumer Cards the only Other option is J.?. Morgan Palladium. The client will ony benefit if he redeems

Nelson, Justin D Cc Young, Janet E Subject: RE: JEFFREY EPS MIN HI Justin, Based on my review: For you

arir•lg-2011 M JP•thiorgaA Chas?. 301-µ34-5580 20; P. From: Rawlings, Dodie Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 8:43 PM To: Nelson, Justin D Cc Young, Janet E Subject: RE: JEFFREY EPS MIN HI Justin, Based on my rev

ctivity. Have a good evening. From: Nelsons Justin D Sent Thursday, February 28, 2013 9:36 AM Tel Rawlings, Dodia CC Young, Janet E Subject: RE JEFFREY EPSTEUA Dodie, any eta on this? Thanks. Justin D. Nelson -Managing Director The prima Bank at ' 100 We Pawn Avenue Greenwic a 06830 I Is; I f: l G-man

l Rawlings, Dodia CC Young, Janet E Subject: RE JEFFREY EPSTEUA Dodie, any eta on this? Thanks. Justin

Thanks. Justin D. Nelson -Managing Director The prima Bank at ' 100 We Pawn Avenue Greenwic a 06830 I Is; I f: l G-man: INIMIS ID 821751 From: Rawlings, Dodle Sent Tuesday, February 26, 2013 9:08 PM To: nelson, Justin O 4 Confidential Treatment Requested by JPMorgan Chase JPM-SDNY-00063009 EFTA