Epstein Secrets

ne issue as to any material facts and that Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. is entitled to summary judgment for all claims brought against him in Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence un

intiff Jeffrey Epstein's Complaint. Not only is there an absence of competent evidence to demonstrate that Edwards participated in any fraud against Epstein, the evidence uncontrovertibly demonstrates the propriety of every aspect of Edwards' involvement in the prosecution of legitimate claims against E

inafter "Epstein Depo.") at 67-68. Therefore summary judgment should be granted for Edwards on all claims involving any Ponzi scheme by Rothstein. b. Epstein Did Not Suffer Any Harm from Allegedly Fraudulent Presentations to Investors. 7 EFTA00725975 At various points in his Complaint, Epstein seems t

, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, OR IN THE AL

Y, FLORIDA Case No.: 50 2009 CA 0408003OOOCMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

ng party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Snyder v. Cheezem Development Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Rule 1.510(c), Fla. R. Civ. P. Once the moving party conclusively establishes that the nonmoving party cannot prevail, it is incumbent on the nonmoving party to submit eviden

ow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and throu

09CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually

NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, indiv

hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of

ow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, INDIVIDUALLY Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and throu

09CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, individually

NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROITHSTETN, indiv

hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ, P. 1.442: 1. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442. 2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of

IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., Defendant(s). ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRETRIAL AND MEDIATION PROCEDURES I. SC

ORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et a

UNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2009CA040800 XXXX MB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff(s), vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, et

agree on a mediator. If they are unable to agree, any party may apply to the Court for appointment of a mediator in conformity with Rule 1.720 (1), Fla. R. Civ. P. The lead attorney or party shall file and serve on all parties and the mediator a Notice of Mediation giving the time, place, and date of the m