Epstein Secrets

:00 p.m. and introduced myself then told her that I wouild contact her at a later date. On 03-11-04, I left a message for to call me regarding the Epstion incident. Her phone number is name Investigation Continues File 2600 August 10, 2004 Dot. CONFIDENTIAL SONY_GM_00329840 EFTA_00202566 EFTA0

bove referenced subpoena was received from the SAO and was served on Bell South via fax. On 02/12/02, an inquiry into corporations on line revealed Jeffrey E. Epstein related to three Florida entities: Financial Strategy Group, Inc; Ghislaine Corp; Financial Trustees, Inc. None of the aforementioned entities are

casssions and described the telephone ails as mon call in saying when they were going to drop of particular girls. All three girls said Maxwell and Epstein were secretive about what was going on at the house, and at least two of the girls complained about Epstein touching them inappropriately. They sai

02562 EFTA01308891 Narrative/Notes A check of Jeffrey E Epstein, DOB 01/20/53, revealed an expired florid

l is clearly exempt from public inspection under the Public Records Law. Fla. Stat. §119.071(2Xd), referring to Section 24(a), Art. I, Fla. Const. D. Epstein's Requests are Unduly Burdensome Finally, even if subject to disclosure under the Public Records Law, Mr. Epstein's request for la]ll cell phone reco

02, an inquiry into corporations on line revealed Jeffrey E. Epstein related to three Florida entities: Finan

ain documents and associated testimony sought by Mr. Epstein, including personal cell phone records, calendars

under public records act); Gannett N.J. Partners v. Ctv. of Middlesex 877 8 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00329855 EFTA_00202581 EFTA01308910 A 2d 330 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005) (finding news organization not entitled to disclosure of the telephone billing records of county officials under the state's op

566 78, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009), lieges that she was "forced to engage in sexual acts with Dershowitz in, among other locations, [Jeffrey] Epstein's mansion ...." (Complaint ("Compl."), dated Apr. 16, 2019 [dkt. no. 1], at ¶ 36). Prior to filing the Complaint, she had filed a joinder motion in

what she believed happened" but Dershowitz asserted that Ms. had "made an honest mistake and had confused [Dershowitz] with another friend of Mr. Epstein." (Id.) Boies says that Dershowitz "was never able to substantiate his assertions" and that the Firm was "increasingly uncovering evidence that wa

acts with Dershowitz in, among other locations, [Jeffrey] Epstein's mansion ...." (Complaint ("Compl."),

had confused [Dershowitz] with another friend of Mr. Epstein." (Id.) Boies says that Dershowitz "was never ab

face to give visitors additional avenues to access the allegedly defamatory statements see Churchill v. State 378 N.J.Super. 471, 876 A.2d 311, 319 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2005); or changing the URL at which the allegedly defamatory statement was posted i.e., posting the statement verbatim to a new URL)

lose my abuse until I was in high school," he said. Juror No. 50 also had an excuse for why the alleged victims in this case kept going back to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell and accepting help from them even after they had been abused. The alleged victims' conduct, explained Juror No. 50, was irrelevant t

JN) GIIISLAINE MAXWE 'S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON. M R AN &

alleged victims in this case kept going back to Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell and accepting help from them even

d 511 (10th Cir. 1998) 29, 35 Smith v. Phillips, 455 U.S. 209 (1982) 21, 25 State v. Ashfar, 196 A.3d 93 (N.H. 2018) 33, 41 State v. Scher, 278 N.J. Super. 249, 263, 650 A.2d 1012 (App. Div. 1994) 45, 46 State v. Thompson, 142 N.J. Super. 274 (App. Div. 1976) 46 State v. Williams, 190 N.J.Super. 111