7
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
16 / 7
Mentions
not ski On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Faith Kates < wrote: Drapkin dying out of the blue!!! Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:11 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: what is? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Faith Kates • No ones around Off to drapkins funeral it's surreal So scr
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Faith Kates • S
ith Kates • Subject: Re: Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 12:31:01 +0000 > old Jews should not ski On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Faith Kates < wrote: Drapkin dying out of the blue!!! Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:11 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: what is? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016
From: Faith Kates To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:11:51 +0000 > Ok where are you did you hear Drapkin passed away yesterday From:
did you hear Drapkin passed away yesterday From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday,
From: Faith Kates To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:11:51 +0000 > Ok where are you did you hear Drapkin passed away yesterday From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:10 PM To: Faith Kates Subject: Re: chin
From: Faith Kates To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Sent Tuesday. February 23, 2016 7:11:51 PM Ok where are you did you hear Drapkin passed away yesterday Fr
did you hear Drapkin passed away yesterday From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday,
: Faith Kates To: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Subject: RE: Re: Sent Tuesday. February 23, 2016 7:11:51 PM Ok where are you did you hear Drapkin passed away yesterday From: Jeffrey E. [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:10 PM To: Faith Kates Subject: Re: chin
From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 7:14 PM To: Faith Kates Subject: Re: Re: paris and yes. On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:11 P
Re: Re: paris and yes. On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Faith Kates > wrote: Ok where are you did you =ear Drapkin passed away yesterday From: jeffrey =. [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:10 PM To: Faith Kates Subject: Re: chinese model
6 7:14 PM To: Faith Kates Subject: Re: Re: paris and yes. On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Faith Kates > wrote: Ok where are you did you =ear Drapkin passed away yesterday From: jeffrey =. [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 2:10 PM To: F
M, Faith Kate wrote: No ones around Off to drapkins funeral it's surreal So screwed up Sent from my iPhone wrote: On Feb 25, 2016, at 5:15 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > neil? please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be at
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:30 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Drapkin dying out of the blue!
From: Faith Kates Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 12:30 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: Drapkin dying out of the blue!!! Sent from my iPhone On Feb 25, 2016, at 7:11 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation@g=ail.com> wrote:
intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; or (3) a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice." Drapkin v. Mafco Consol. Grp., Inc., 818 F. Supp. 2d 678, 696 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). "A motion for reconsideration 1 EFTA00018294 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:1
Page: EFTA00018294 →ginal objection to unsealing, Ms. Maxwell argued that the specter of ongoing criminal investigations into unknown individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein--a group that, of course, includes Ms. Maxwell--loomed large over the Court-ordered unsealing 2 The Court notes as a practical matter that Ms. Maxw
Page: EFTA00018295 →to unknown individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein--a group that, of course, includes Ms. Maxwell--
Page: EFTA00018295 →ions into unknown individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein--a group that, of course, includes Ms. M
Page: EFTA00018295 →intervening change in controlling law; (2) the availability of new evidence; or (3) a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice." Drapkin v. Mafco Consol. Grp., Inc., 818 F. Supp. 2d 678, 696 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). "A motion for reconsideration 1 EFTA00024875 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 1:1
Page: EFTA00024875 →ginal objection to unsealing, Ms. Maxwell argued that the specter of ongoing criminal investigations into unknown individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein--a group that, of course, includes Ms. Maxwell--loomed large over the Court-ordered unsealing 1 The Court notes as a practical matter that Ms. Maxw
Page: EFTA00024876 →to unknown individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein--a group that, of course, includes Ms. Maxwell--
Page: EFTA00024876 →ions into unknown individuals associated with Jeffrey Epstein--a group that, of course, includes Ms. M
Page: EFTA00024876 →Entities connected to both Jeffrey Epstein and Drapkin

Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONFaith Kates
PERSON
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Bennett
PERSONLoretta A. Preska
PERSONthe Court of Appeals
ORGANIZATIONWatson Wyatt & Co.
ORGANIZATIONBeacon Assocs.
ORGANIZATIONORDER LORETTA A. PRESKA
PERSONHealth Mgmt.
ORGANIZATIONMafco Consol.
ORGANIZATIONS.D.N.Y. 2011
LOCATION