Epstein Secrets

YORK. NEW YORK 10019 FAX: wwwlemichlaw.com July 16, 2019 BY ECF Hon. Richard M. Berman USDJ-SDNY 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to su

90 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mistake about the crux of the government's detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its cor

sterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mist

the remand presumption. Third, as apparent from Mr. Epstein's initial financial disclosure, Mr. Epstein's fi

perative presumption and make himself eligible for release. That cannot be the law. Such a construction turns the statute's massages for money. See Fierro u. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (SDNY July 2, 2012) (holding that sex purchasers from minors fall outside § 1591's ambit). 2 E.g., 7/15/19

York, NY 10007 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620 NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10019 212-446-2346 FAX: 212-459-2299 wwwlemichlaw.com July 16, 2019 Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to su

90 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mistake about the crux of the government's detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its cor

sterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mist

the remand presumption. Third, as apparent from Mr. Epstein's initial financial disclosure, Mr. Epstein's fi

perative presumption and make himself eligible for release. That cannot be the law. Such a construction turns the statute's massages for money. See Fierro u. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (SDNY July 2, 2012) (holding that sex purchasers from minors fall outside § 1591's ambit). 2 E.g., 7/15/19

York, NY 10007 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620 NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10019 212-446-2346 FAX: 212-459-2299 wwwlemichlaw.com July 16, 2019 Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to su

90 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mistake about the crux of the government's detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its cor

sterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mist

the remand presumption. Third, as apparent from Mr. Epstein's initial financial disclosure, Mr. Epstein's fi

perative presumption and make himself eligible for release. That cannot be the law. Such a construction turns the statute's massages for money. See Fierro u. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (SDNY July 2, 2012) (holding that sex purchasers from minors fall outside § 1591's ambit). 2 E.g., 7/15/19

York, NY 10007 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620 NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10019 212-446-2346 FAX: 212-459-2299 wwwlemichlaw.com July 16, 2019 Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to su

90 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mistake about the crux of the government's detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its cor

sterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mist

erson of Epstein's means could say, do or pledge to rebut the operative presumption and make himself eligible for release. massages for money. See Fierro u. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (SDNY July 2, 2012) (holding that purchasers of sex from minors fall outside § 1591's ambit). 2 E.g., 7/15

York, NY 10007 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620 NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10019 212-446-2346 FAX: 212-459-2299 wwwlemichlaw.com July 16, 2019 Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY) Dear Judge Berman: In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made yesterday by the government, we write to su

sterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mistake abou

sterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein's request for bail. First, make no mist

perative presumption and make himself eligible for release. That cannot be the law. Such a construction turns the statute's massages for money. See Fierro u. Taylor, No. 11-CV8573, 2012 WL 13042630, at *3 (SDNY July 2, 2012) (holding that sex purchasers from minors fall outside § 1591's ambit). 2 E.g., 7/15/19

the remand presumption. Third, as apparent from Mr. Epstein's initial financial disclosure, Mr. Epstein's fi