Epstein Secrets

rand tampion. ftbdLiidtddafLS teadi.01444.41a la News Emus.* News Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Case In a landmark decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Court on April 18 2014, ruled In favor of two crime victims represented by

tell the girls." U.S. Attorneys Correspondence at 359. The reasonable inference is that the "marching orders" agreed to between the Government and Epsteinls-tiefense-eounsel-was-that-ne-mention-weuld-be-made-octhe-ROli-pfeseeutiewegreement between-the-U,SrAttertieyls-Gfflee-anii-Epsteiur as-fie-subseque

0. hi—approximately—May-2009r eounsekfer—Jene—Dee44—and—Jane—Dee—#2—propeundefl diseoveFy—request-s—in—bech—state—ttafi—fedecal—eivikeases—against—Epsteier seeking—to—obtain eorrespendenee-hetween-Epstein-and-pfeseeutefs-regar4ing-his-piea-agreemem—infoFmatien-that the-6178-.-Attemey2s-Offiee-was-unwi

of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E Epstein Case Posted on Wed, Apr 23,2014 1.1.1/4

H • Proven Resells • Willa • Bles SOICh Current Adsak ID PSS Feed Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Crime Victims' Rights in Registered Pedophile Jeffrey E Epstein Case Posted on Wed, Apr 23,2014 1.1.1/401 ij-inti reek attiglIST1014 Patti 1 ol IPLIBLIsHi N THE UNIT I D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FUR THE ELEVENTH

o settle civil suits BY SUSAN SPENCER.WENDEL Pam 80•01 Post Shoff Meer Friday. Seplamber 10.2009 WEST PALM BEACH — fiflonaire Mender sex offender Jeffrey Epstaln's secret non-proseaNch weaned ha 'Ouch with Wein prosecutor, was Waxed Friday. Offering the not pubic look et the deal Epstein's high-powered legal c

t's desire that federal charges be filed against defendant Epstein. In particular, he wrote on behalf of his client

2006 the FBI began investigating allegations that Jeffrey E. Epstein had sexually abused dozens and dozens of

ter-about-the-money isuo, just about what crimes Mr. Epstein is pleading guilty to and the amount of time-tha

ie Villafana secured pro bono counsel to represent Jane Doe #1. Pro bono counsel was able to assist Jane Doe #1 in avoiding the improper deposition. AUSA Villafaila secured pro bono counsel by contacting Meg Garvin, Esq. of the the National Crime Victims' Law Center in Portland, Oregon, which is based in the Le

egan speaking with the agents and then excused herself to go upstairs to check on her sleeping child. While upstairs, Ms. telephoned the defendant, Jeffrey Epsteiriand informed him that the FBI agents were at her home. Mr. Epstein instructed Ms= not to speak with the agents and reprimanded her for allowing them i

ing specific facts as the undisputed material facts in this case. Each of the following facts is numbered separately and individually to facilitate Epstein's required compliance with Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on which the adverse part

. P. 1.510(c) ("The adverse party shall identify . . . any summary judgment evidence on which the adverse party relies."). Sexual Abuse of Children Dv Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children. Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein, Mar. 17, 2010, at 110 (hereinafter "Epstein Depo."

lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." Jeffrey Epstein: International Moneyman of Mystery; He's pals with a passel of Nobel Prize—winning scientists, CEOs like

ies."). Sexual Abuse of Children Dv Epstein 1. Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children. Depos

unediate family that I send drafts to is Jeffrey" The Talented Mr. Epstein, By Vicky Ward on January, 2005 in Published Wor

t the United States Attorney's Office prepared negotiated plea agreements containing these charges. For example, in a September 18, 2007, email from AUSA Villafaila to Lefkowitz (attached hereto as Exhibit "H"), she attached the proposed plea agreement describing Epstein's witness tampering as follows: "UNITED

will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein if any, will be dismissed. Page 2 of 7 EFTA00213055 Terms of the Agreement I. Epstein shall plead guilty (not nob contendere) to the Indictment as currently pending against him in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach Count

S ATTORNEY Dated: /D /3010 '7. • Dated: Dated: Bed: t ts /91W4 BY: 4 ASSIST U.S. ATTORNEY JEFFREY EPSITaN GERALD LEFCOURT, ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFFREYEPSTEIN LILLYANNSANCH87, ES ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EPSTEIN EFTA00213120 Exhibit 17 EFTA00213121 10/25/07 THU 13:16 FAX 305 530 8440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE

fendant Date of Plea Defendant EFTA00213094 PLEA Ilk THE CIRCUITCOURT THE FOLLOWING IS TO REFLECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Lester Degree C6CF039454AMB Felony Solicitation of Prostitution 1 No 3 FEL OSCF0D9361AMB Pr curing Person

FREY EPSIEN RALD LEFCO RT ESQ. COUNSEL TO JEFF Y EPSTEIN LILLY ANN SANCHEZ, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR JEFFREY EP

ECT ALL TERMS OF THE NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT Name: Jeffrey E Epstein Plea: Gusty Dfle No. Charge Count Les

is not a party to any of the civil suits against Mr. Epstein pending in the U.S. District Court or any state

. Next, you assert that our letter miscb aractetizes Mr. Epstein's obligation to pay damages to the victims. To avoid that suggestion, I have asked AUSA Villafaila to simply quote the terms of the Agreement directly into the Notification Letter. We also have no objection to referring to Mr. Epstein as a "sexua

notice of court proceedings as required by 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(2) are frivolous; the only court proceedings that have taken place in connection with Epstein's criminal offenses were state court proceedings involving state criminal offenses, for which the CVRA does not 2 EFTA00081017 Case 9:08-cv-8073

ling was also necessary to ensure secrecy, so that as few persons as possible were aware that minor girls were coming at unusual hours to Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's mansion. 48. Defendant, Sarah Kellen, also needed (directly or indirectly) to make transportation arrangements for many of the girls, as they were

f is included in the list of victims identified by the Federal Government as victims of the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's illegal conduct. Defendant, Jeffrey Page 5 of 17 EFTA00081103 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Page 90 of 101 Epstein, is thus estopped by his ple

ert[ing] a cause of action against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to [18 U.S.C. § 2255] and the

nd we are going to be filing civil cases against Mr. Epstein, and this agreement, undoubtedly it will play a b

2005) (recognizing that the CVRA does not require notice of public court proceedings based on violations of state criminal law), and, in any event, AUSA Villafaila provided Petitioners with pre-hearing notice of those state proceeding — in which Epstein pled guilty to state criminal charges — upon the governme

' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, that affect all crime victims in this Circuit. After over a decade of litigation, the Majority holds that Jeffrey Epsteie's victims were not authorized to bring this petition because the CVRA does not permit stand- alone suits, and, therefore, it should have been dismisse

pstein. In her mandamus petition, Ms. Wild asserts that when federal prosecutors secretly negotiated and executed a non- prosecution agreement with Epstein in 2007, they violated her rights under the CVRA—in particular, her rights to confer with and to be treated fairly by the government's lawyers. We

ida to some extent). While he was in custody on these charges, Epstein was found dead. Statement of Attorney General William P. Barr on the Death of Jeffrey Epstein (Aug. 10, 2018), available at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pristatement-attorney-general-william-p- barr-death-jeffrey-epstein. In June 2020,

t resolves the federal investigation by allowing Mr. Epstein to plead to a state offense. The victims identifi

e a lengthy process and we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation." Further, on January 31, 2008, Wild met with AUSA Villafaila, FBI agents, and another federal prosecutor, provided additional details of Epstein's sexual abuse of her, and expressed her hope that Epstein woul

rable Mark Filip Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein was a part-time resident of Palm Beach County, Florida! In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began inves

resident of Palm Beach County, Florida! In 2006, the Federal Bureau of Investigation began investigating allegations that, over a two-year period, Epstein paid approximately 28 minor females from Royal Palm Beach High School to come to his house for sexual favors.2 In July 2006, the matter was presente

nnsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, 20530 Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Judge Filip, Jeffrey Epstein was a

d/or 2423. During that meeting, the focus was on Mr. Epstein's unwillingness to spend time in prison, and var

e S. Fisher, as well as the Criminal Division's Appellate Section and the Office of Enforcement Operations regarding the petit policy. By May 2007, AUSA Villafaila began seeking approval from her supervisors to indict Epstein. Her immediate supervisor was Andrew Lourie. Mr. Lourie had served as the Chief of the

l relevant times, the Office had approximately 20 Assistant U.S. Attorneys assigned to the West Palm Beach location. The prosecutor assigned to the Epstein case, Ann Marie Villafana, end I were assigned to different sections within the Office. We reported to different supervisors. 11. I did not partic

ent 79 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/03/2011 Page 2 of 4 violated Florida Bar rules and Department of Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the undersigned retired from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "Of

Justice regulations by representing employees of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") in civil litigation after the

s retained to represent several other members of Mr. Epstein's staff in their civil depositions. I5.. After

tters in approximately June 2007 [Jane Doe #1] and August 2006 [Jane Doe #2) wherein they were advised of this right and given the phone numbers of AUSA Villafaila, FBI Special Agent Kuyrkendall, and the Justice Department's Office for Victims of Crime. The letters specifically advised that if the Petitioners

necessary" (doc. #17 at I). The Office asserted that the Court need only take judicial notice of the fact that no indictment had been filed against Epstein to resolve the case. On August I, 2008, the victims filed a response to the Government's "Notice" (doe. #19), giving a proposed statement of facts

n for sexually abusing them. During the course of that litigation, in June 2001, they obtained correspondence between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Jeffrey Epstein's legal counsel. Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 ultimately settled their civil suits in July 2010. During the settlement discussions, they informed Epste

hether a charging document was ever filed against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for

in "the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial." Declaration of Marie V

llowed those other victims to participate while maintaining some semblance of privacy. Petitioners also reiterate baseless allegations made against AUSA Villafaila regarding the choice of the attorney-representative for the victims, despite knowing that: (1) the issue of the attorney-representative arose after

response to your November 2811' letter, in which you raise concerns regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter focused on the Section 2255 portion of the Agreement, my response will focus primarily to that iss

Y cc: Alice Fisher, Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Sloman, First Assistant U.S. Attorney AUSA A. Ma

on Agreement between this Office and your client, Mr. Epstein. I take these concerns seriously. As your letter

ion 2255 provision issue was first discussed at a July 31, 2007, meeting between FAUSA Sloman, Criminal Chief Menchel, West Palm Beach Chief Lourie, AUSA Villafaila, and two FBI agents who met with Roy Black, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez. On that date, the prosecutors presented a written, four-bullet-

1 EFTA00013926 --- PAGE BREAK --- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2008 Page 2 of 16 Agreement with defendant Epstein that is at the center of this litigation and (2) the FBI's report of interview concerning a meeting with Jane Doe #1. These requests were also made

D Docket 08/01/2008 Page 2 of 16 Agreement with defendant Epstein that is at the center of this litigation and (2)

-- Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 19 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2008 Page 4 of 16 Investigation opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage in prostitution (among other

ion opened an investigation into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein had used facilities of interstate commer

criminal prosecution commensurate with the crimes Mr. Epstein has committed, and we further urge you to take t