Epstein Secrets

From: < a> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:50:50 +0000 This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. • C. Debra

From: < a> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Date: Tue, 06

From: < a> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Date:

From: < a> To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 14:50:50 +0000 This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. • C. Debra Welch, Esq. practices almost exclusively in the area of marital and family law with The Law Firm of C.

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 8/6/2013 3:43:33 PM Subject Re: ok On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM > wrote: This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, E

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 8/6/2013 3:43:33 PM Subject Re: ok

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 8/6/2013 3:43:33 PM Subject R

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 8/6/2013 3:43:33 PM Subject Re: ok On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM > wrote: This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. • C. Debra Welch, Esq. practices almost exclusively in the area of marital and family law with The Law Finn of C

To: Story Cowles[ From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 3/30/2010 7:34:30 PM Subject: Re: Operating account at Jacks 25k On Tuc, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Story Cowles <Ma. wrote: Sherry inf

To: Story Cowles[ From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 3/30/2010 7:34:30 PM Subject: Re: Ope

To: Story Cowles[ From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Tue 3/30/2010 7:34:30 PM Subject:

t: Re: Operating account at Jacks 25k On Tuc, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Story Cowles <Ma. wrote: Sherry informed me that there is no more money in Jacks operating account. Should Rich wire some more? If so how much? Sent from Story's iPhone *t*t*t*t*t*t*t*****t*t*t*t*t*t***t***t*t***t*t*t*t*t*t*t*t

From: Sent: To: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 2:51 PM Jeffrey Epstein This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. C. Debra Welch, =sq. practices almost exclusively in the area of marital =nd family l

t: To: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 2:51 PM Jeffrey Epstein This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debr

om: Sent: To: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 2:51 PM Jeffrey Epstein This is the attorney Jacks recommends..

From: Sent: To: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 2:51 PM Jeffrey Epstein This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. C. Debra Welch, =sq. practices almost exclusively in the area of marital =nd family law with The Law Firm of C.

From: Sent: To: Subject: ok On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:44 PM Re: This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. wrote: C. Debra Welch,

ect: ok On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Tuesday, August 6, 2013

o: Subject: ok On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Tuesday, August

o: Subject: ok On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:50 AM Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Tuesday, August 6, 2013 3:44 PM Re: This is the attorney Jacks recommends.. C. Debra Welch, Esq. wrote: C. Debra Welch, Esq. practices almost exclusive=y in the area of marital and family law with The Law Fi=

To: Jeffrey [email protected]] From: Story Cowles Sent: Tue 3/30/2010 7:33:04 PM Subject: Operating account at Jacks informed me that there is

[email protected]] From: Story Cowles Sent: Tue 3/30/2010 7:33:04 PM Subject: Operating account at Jacks informed me that there is no more money in Jacks operating account. Should Rich wire some more? If so how much? Sent from Story's iPhone EFTA_R1_01497307 EFTA02427979

legal relief that Petitioners have sought pursuant to the CVRA is the setting aside of the Non-Prosecution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO-SDFL"). See, e.g., DE 99 at 6 (recognizing that the relief Petitioners se

oners seek "is to invalidate the non-prosecution agreement"). But even assuming arguendo that Petitioners' rights under the CVRA were violated when Epstein and the USAO-SDFL entered into the Non- Prosecution Agreement, constitutional due process guarantees do not allow either the Non- Prosecution Agreeme

secution Agreement that was entered into between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the So

hether the claim is sufficiently mature, and the issues sufficiently defined and concrete, to permit effective decisionmaking by the court."' In re Jacks, 642 F.3d 1323, 1332 (11th Cir. 2011) (quoting Cheffer v. Reno, 55 F.3d 1517, 1524 (11th Cir. 1995)). When evaluating whether a claim is ripe, a co