Epstein Secrets

Subject: 2-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein) Attachments: 02-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein).pctf Tracking: Recipient Delivery Read Chris Kroblin Denise George Good Morning Attorney Kroblin: Delivered: 2/10/2020 10:19 AM Read: 2/10/2020 1

e executors arc directly associated with entities that are defendants in the Government's lawsuit and which allegedly facilitated or participated in Epstein's criminal activity, should play no role in choosing a claims administrator or in designing a compensation program. While the Estate has indicated

-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein) Attachments: 02-10-2020 Letter to Chr

-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein) Attachments: 02-10-2020 Letter to Chri

10, 2020 Page 2 entities that participated in, facilitated, or covered up Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. I understand that, after I raised this issue, the Epstein Fund has now offered to remove those broad releases from its protocol. That is a positive step, but the commitment must be made binding. Third, the Epst

ect Attachments: Tracking: Monday, February 10, 202010:19 AM Chris roblin Denise George 02-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein) 02-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein).pdf Recipient Delivery Read Chris Kroblin Denise George Good Morning

blin Denise George 02-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein) 02-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein).pdf Recipient Delivery Read Chris Kroblin Denise George Good Morning Attorney Kroblin: Delivered: 2/1012020 10:19AM Read: 2/1012020

e executors arc directly associated with entities that are defendants in the Government's lawsuit and which allegedly facilitated or participated in Epstein's criminal activity, should play no role in choosing a claims administrator or in designing a compensation program. While the Estate has indicated

-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kroblin (Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein) 02-10-2020 Letter to Christopher Kro

10, 2020 Page 2 entities that participated in, facilitated, or covered up Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. I understand that, after I raised this issue, the Epstein Fund has now offered to remove those broad releases from its protocol. That is a positive step, but the commitment must be made binding. Third, the Epst

Maxwell violated and conspired to violate the federal sex trafficking statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1591. Count Five alleges that Ms. Maxwell conspired with Epstein and others to recruit "a person" knowing that the person "had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act

by any means" individuals who were under the age of 18, including Accuser-4, "who were then caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act with Jeffrey Epstein." (Id. 127). Both counts are based on the allegations of Accuser-4 and allege conduct that purportedly occurred "[f]rom at least in or about 2001,

A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P 17(c)(3) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN &

667, 684, (1985). Full and complete cross-examination of the Accusers is impossible without understanding the complete terms of the agreement with the Epstein Fund, including the claims concerning Ms. Maxwell, as well as others. Cf. Moore v. Marr, 254 F.3d 1235, 1244 (10th Cir. 2001) (noting that witnesses' "a

Maxwell violated and conspired to violate the federal sex trafficking statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1591. Count Five alleges that Ms. Maxwell conspired with Epstein and others to recruit "a person" knowing that the person "had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act

by any means" individuals who were under the age of 18, including Accuser-4, "who were then caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act with Jeffrey Epstein." (Id. 127). Both counts are based on the allegations of Accuser-4 and allege conduct that purportedly occurred "[f]rom at least in or about 2001,

A SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P 17(c)(3) Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN &

667, 684, (1985). Full and complete cross-examination of the Accusers is impossible without understanding the complete terms of the agreement with the Epstein Fund, including the claims concerning Ms. Maxwell, as well as others. Cf. Moore v. Marr, 254 F.3d 1235, 1244 (10th Cir. 2001) (noting that witnesses' "a

me know if you have two minutes to talk about the Epstein Fund. Also around Monday if that's better. > Or

: Frida , December 20, 2019 1:56 PM > To: (USANYS) <MINIMIIM>; (USANYS) > Subject: RE: Nycha > Let me know if you have two minutes to talk about the Epstein Fund. Also around Monday if that's better. > Original Messa e---- > From: (USANYS) <MINIMIIN> > Sent: Friday, December 20, 2019 1:42 PM EFTA00031584

erations omitted)). In order to initiate a proceeding with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, a victim must articulate a claim "directed against Epstein." (Indep. Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Protocol, Def. Mot. Ex. 1 Attachment A Ex. 1 at 3 (emphasis added)). And in that context, it would

impeachment information because "[f]ull and complete cross-examination is impossible without understanding the complete terms of the agreement with the Epstein Fund, including the claims concerning Maxwell, as well as others." (Def. Mot. at 6). Materials are not relevant and admissible at trial, as required by

impeachment information because "[f]ull and complete cross-examination is impossible without understanding the complete terms of the agreement with the Epstein Fund, including the claims concerning Maxwell, as well as others." (Def. Mot. at 6). Materials are not relevant and admissible at trial, as required by

erations omitted)). In order to initiate a proceeding with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, a victim must articulate a claim "directed against Epstein." (Indep. Epstein Victims' Compensation Program Protocol, Def. Mot. Ex. 1 Attachment A Ex. 1 at 3 (emphasis added)). And in that context, it would