Epstein Secrets

77 everything, but I really do not think that Mr. Epstein is going to engage in serious negotiations until

orking on a deferred [sic] prosecution agreement because it may well be that we cannot reach agreement here.” The defense redline version required Epstein to plead guilty to a federal information charging two misdemeanor counts of attempt to intentionally harass a person to prevent testimony, the pendi

154 The Affirmation read: “I, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affirm the Non-Prosecution

d victims of state crimes secure civil financial settlements.” 154 The Affirmation read: “I, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affirm the Non-Prosecution Agreement and Addendum to same dated October 30, 2007.” 155 Villafaña sent Lefkowitz a five-page letter r

147 Acosta and Villafaña were copied on this email. 148 The Addendum is attached as Exhibit 4 to this Report. 94 D. Epstein Further Delays His Guilty Plea The addendum did not bring the case to conclusion. Instead, the matter entered a new, protracted phase, which inv

154 The Affirmation read: “I, Jeffrey E. Epstein do hereby re-affirm the Non-Prosecution A

ecause the passive enforcement policy was not intended to have a discriminatory effect, the claim of selective prosecution failed. In Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976), the Supreme Court considered whether a state prosecutor acting within the scope of his duties could be sued under 42 U.S.C. §

S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1 , 18 L. Ed.2d 865 (1967); Buchanan Rhodes. 885 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 83, 17 .Ed.2d 9 (1966); Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed2d 794 (1962). Since in this case we affirm that refusal, we need not now decide whether or not there is juri

, Gary A. Hughes, J.D, Steven D. Najarian, J.D., Jeffrey A. Schafer, J.D., and Jeffrey J. Shampo, J.D. II

th the district court, however, that the officials involved in this action would be entitled to immunity from such damage claims. Under hnbter v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 96 S.CL 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976), state prosecutors are absolutely immune from damage suits with respect to their quasi-judicial

t: C20 assistance Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:33:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Andy We would like to get 2 people to support our media review for the Epstein case. Can you have the 2 people reach out direct to Amanda Young copied above for further instruction and to set up a CAIR account. Thank you again

From: Seamus Clarke To: "Pachtman, Andrew P. (NY) Cc: BI)" 'oung, manda N. (NY) (FBI)" Subject: C20 assistance Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:33:03 +0000 Importance: Normal Andy We