Epstein Secrets

COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein, et al., Defendants. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: X OPINION AND ORDER On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff iled a motion to dismiss this acti

k law. These claims stem from and/or arise in connection with Mr. EFTA00095371 Case 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF Document 118 Filed 02/10/21 Page 2 of 6 Epstein's and Ms. Maxwell's alleged sexual abuse of Plaintiff. Defendants did not file counterclaims. On June 2, 2020, the Superior Court of the United Sta

Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a voluntary independent program designed to compensate and resolve the claims of victims of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein (the "Program"). On June 22, 2020, based on an understanding that Plaintiff wished to participate in the Program and that participation could result

pacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together

pacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together,

aintiff executed a release, releasing the Estate, Mr. Epstein and other related entities and individuals, incl

r a court order provides otherwise, costs -- other than attorney's fees -- should be allowed to the prevailing party."); see Carter v. Inc. Vii/. of Ocean Beach, 759 F.3d 159, 165 (2d Cir. 2014) ("A voluntary dismissal of an action with prejudice works [a material alteration of the legal relationship of the

----------------------------X JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, an individual, Defendants. 20-cv-00484-JGK ------------------------------------------------------X GHISLAINE

of this action in future litigation either against plaintiff (e.g., as claims for malicious prosecution or abuse of process), against the Estate of Epstein (under an indemnification theory), or both. See Opinion and Order of Feb. 10, 2021 at 5 (DE 118); accord Opinion and Order of Mar. 9, 2021, Jane D

n their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, an individual, Defe

is a prevailing party, or alternatively, that a district court has discretion to award costs to the defendant.”); see also Carter v. Inc. Vill. of Ocean Beach, 759 F.3d 159, 165 (2d Cir. 2014) (disclaiming prior Second Circuit dicta which stated that “generally the defendant is not considered the prevailin

CT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X Plaintiff, 19 Civ. 10475 (LGS) -against- DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as executor : of the Estate ofJeffkey Edward Epstein, et al., Defendants. LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: X OPINION AND ORDER On January 21, 2021, Plaintiff filed I motion to dismiss this act

plaint against Ms. Maxwell and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their official capacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together, the "Co-Executors"). The Complaint alleges claims of battery, false imprisonment and intentional inflictio

pacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn together,

pacities as appointed executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate") (Indyke and Kahn togeth

ce of an offer of compensation on October 5, 2020. In exchange for the offer of compensation, Plaintiff executed' release, releasing the Estate, Mr. Epstein and other related entities and individuals, including Ms. Maxwell, from any and all claims (the "General Release"). To receive her compensation, Pl

laintiff executed' release, releasing the Estate, Mr. Epstein and other related entities and individuals, incl

or' court order provides otherwise, costs -- other than attorney's fees -- should be allowed to the prevailing party."); see Carter v. Inc. VIII of Ocean Beach, 759 F.3d 159, 165 (2d Cir. 2014) (", voluntary dismissal of an action with prejudice works [I material alteration of the legal relationship of the