Epstein Secrets

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2009 Page 1 of 22 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-cv-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON __________ .! JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE N

13) (the "Notice of Conditional Reliance"), With Incorporated Memorandum of Law. An expeditious ruling by this Court is now critical. 3 In support, Epstein states: 1 DE 114 and DE 121 were stricken because they were incorrectly filed pursuant to the Court's Order consolidating cases. Plaintiff refilled

ocket 07/21/2009 Page 4 of 22 Page4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Response In Opposition to Plaintiff, Ca

complex medical issue); Alexander v. City of Bellingham, 2008 WL 2077970 (W.D. Wash. 2008); Grit v. Target Corp., 2008 WL 1777744 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Trenary v. Bush Entertainment Corp .. 2006 WL 3333621 (M.D. Fla. 2006)(responses to interrogatories placed plaintiff's mental condition at issue); Tracey P.

/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON I PLAINTIFF, C.M.A.'S, RESPONSE AND INCORPORATED MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT, JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW {DE 228) Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through her under

in support there of states as follows: 3 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 254 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/2009 Page 4 of 9 1. Defendant, JEFFERY E. EPSTEIN, filed on July 29, 2009 his Emergency Motion for Independent Examination of Plaintiff with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE 228). 2. After seve

MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT, JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INDEPENDENT EXAMI

e determined later, Plaintiff moves for the entry of a protective order limiting the time permitted for the examination and any testing to 6 hours. Trenary v. Busch Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 3333621 (M.D. Fla.)(limiting a psychiatric evaluation to four (4) hours) and Tracey v. Sarasota County, 2006

09 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. _______________ ./ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591,09-8065

d records from a "CMA" designation? Then, on May 20, 2009, C.M.A. capitulated and filed her Notice of Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Epstein's Motion to Compel and/or Identify C.M.A. in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discover

6,09-80802,09-81092 --------------~/ Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintifrs Response In Opposit

complex medical issue); Alexander v. City of Bellingham, 2008 WL 2077970 (W.D. Wash. 2008); Grit v. Target Corp., 2008 WL 1777744 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Trenary v. Bush Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 3333621 (M.D. Fla. 2006)(responses to interrogatories placed plaintiffs mental condition at issue); Tracey P.

-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 PLAINTIFF, C.M.A.’S, RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN’S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION OF PLAINTIFF WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM

8 F.R.D. 294, 295-96 (S.D>N.Y. 1994). A limitation of 6 hours for the examination would allow even more time than the 4 hour limitation imposed in Trenary v. Busch Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 279 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/27/2009 Page 5 of 8 Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 333621 (M.D. Fla) an