Epstein Secrets

3 i 2 3 THE COURT: Good morning. Have a seat. Thank you. Needless co say the recent barrage, as 3 4 opposed to flurry, of activity that has JEFFREY EPSTEIN, S transpired is of extreme consternation to Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, vs. 4 the court. It has caused me to have to SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indivi

ck. So I look forward to discussing the privileged nature of the documents. And I thank Hr. Cassell for being here today. Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial docket. It was prompted by Mr. Edwards' motion to separate the trials, which was motion -- for the ob

31:18,19 38:16 41:20 57:14 81:8 81:25 84:3 88:20 iteration 36:8,23 73:12 79:4 iterations 43:8 51:9 J 2:6 JACK 2:9,18 JAMES 2:13 Jane 2:12 Jeffrey 1:5 2:16 joined 30:2 joint 10:2044:25 JR 2:10 judge 1:164:14 7:23 8:2,17 9:3 15:19 21:21 29:11 30:1,2,3 36:16 40:14,22,22 41:6 41:17 43:25 4

assell for being here today. Your Honor, this is Mr. Epstein's motion to remove this case from the trial doc

was the case at issue. Rule 1.440 is ono of the most strictly complied with mandatory rules of civil procedure, which has boon recognized by the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and it's ono of those rare instances when a petition for writ of mandamus is appropriate when it's not complied with. So we need to look at the

f the Palm Beach Post (“the Post”), appeals a final judgment denying the Post’s request for access to the grand jury proceedings involving the late Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues the final judgment should be reversed for three reasons: (1) section 905.27, Florida Statutes (2019), provides a private right

is a party before the “in furtherance of justice” provision could be invoked. The trial court agreed “the established matters surrounding Mr. Epstein’s conduct, the circumstances of his resolution of the 2006 state charges and potential federal charges, and his 2008 guilty plea and incarceration

to the grand jury proceedings involving the late Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues the final judgment sho

McDonald Nina D. Boyajian kr FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK 05/26/2023 04:31:39 PM NOT A CERTIFIED COPY LONN WEISSBLUM,. Clerk Fourth District Court of Appeal DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CA FLORIDA HOLDINGS, LLC, Publisher of THE PALM BEACH POST, Appellant, v.

THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SET IN THIS MATTER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epste

EIN'S MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SET IN THIS MATTER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 9.310 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby requests that this Court s

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

ution, and entered Final Judgment in accordance therewith. Edwards timely appealed this Court's ruling as to his Malicious Prosecution count to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The issue was fully briefed, and on November 12, 2015, Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301• 954.467.1223 EFTA0061163

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA0408007OOOCMBAG JUDGE: HAFELE Defendants. PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RENEWED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SET IN THIS MATTER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein

NEWED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE THE TRIAL DATE SET IN THIS MATTER Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 9.310 of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, hereby requests that this Court s

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, indiv

ution, and entered Final Judgment in accordance therewith. Edwards timely appealed this Court's ruling as to his Malicious Prosecution count to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The issue was fully briefed, and on November 12, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal reversed this Court's ruling and certified conflict with

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Story Cowles Sent: Wed 7/1/2009 7:04:08 PM Subject: Fwd: Google Alert - "Jeffrey epstein" Sent from Story's iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Google Alerts <, Date: July I, 2009 2:42:50 PM EDT To: Subject: Google Alert - "jeffre

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Story Cowles Sent

To: Jeffrey Epstein[[email protected]] From: Story Cowl

: July I, 2009 2:42:50 PM EDT To: Subject: Google Alert - "jeffrey epstein" Google Web Alert for: "jeffrey epstein" Jeffrey Epstein attorney asks Fourth District Court of Appeal to ... Lawyers for convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein are asking the Fourth District Court of Appeal to block the impending release of his non-