Epstein Secrets

From: Ian Osborne To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Investment Update Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 23:37:09 +0000 It is Yuri's vehicle. But we can use that or any othe

, "Jeffrey Epstein" <[email protected]> wrote: yes , of course. what is apoletto.??? On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Ian Osborne < > wrote: Jeffrey - here is the explanation as discussed last night. Would you mind conveying your instruction about dropping any changes that require other sharehold

From: Ian Osborne To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Investment

he investor documents without having to obtain approval of the other parties to those documents. Given the affiliation between Mort, Hedosophia and Apoletto and their aggregate share purchases, Jawbone is comfortable agreeing to a side letter in which it would agree to treat all three of those investors

To: Ian Osborne Fran: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 9/21/2012 11:53:17 AM Subject Re: ok.. any word from bloomberg. I am seeing my friend tonight On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Ian Osbo

To: Ian Osborne Fran: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 9/21/2012 11:53:17 AM Subject Re: ok

To: Ian Osborne Fran: Jeffrey Epstein Sent Fri 9/21/2012 11:53:17 AM Subject

2012 at 6:29 AM, Ian Osborne wrote: In London - I missed this last night but let's talk this morning about UN week stuff. No letter is needed for Apoletto - I had misestimated the share numbers required for Major Investor status; Mort and Hedosophia more than qualify between them, so that letter is now

From: Sent: To: Subject: lan Osborne 9/7/2012 2:40:14 AM Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Re: Jawbone/Mort What else are you interested in? Peter is best for currency; maybe Reid Hoffman (fatty at LinkedIn) or Dave

Subject: lan Osborne 9/7/2012 2:40:14 AM Jeffrey Epstein [[email protected]] Re: Jawbone/Mort What els

have the same closing conditions that applied to the initial closing of the JP Morgan investment. Given the affiliation between Mort, Hedosophia and Apoletto and their collective investment in preferred and common stock, we also want to propose that Mort (along with the other two parties) be treated as a "