Epstein Secrets

ey were over 18/Advised by whom? as a vise o say she was 17 by YES/ NU YES - YES -_.advised In that she would make $200.00, to dress cute, JE might touch her, and to tell JE if she was uncomfortable and JE 11 would stop. EFTA01699909 A B 1 12 VICTIM WITNESS DOB Jane Doe fil _

(Ainown a she refs drecdy responsible for remitting girls bit admits during a proffer she was trained by to schedge R. and NY massage appoirommis S Epstein. -nos made to ;edam manage. an Epstein at hiSte Island. Ross vim insluded by I= to regime tans from Ns Palm Beach home and Virgin Wand home an

ach home and Virgin Wand home and have them destroyed during the Palm Bead) inveotigcbcin. taknowe If she Sealy recruited or abused any d the as. Jeffrey Epstein 31E-NY-3027571 Ovate property manager brad Epstdn's property's. Was observed by a property manager to have S remds girls Mat spider web into t

If she Sealy recruited or abused any d the as. Jeffrey Epstein 31E-NY-3027571 Ovate property manager b

Multiple Victoria's Secret underwear sets. YES - Brazilian bathing suit, Western Union - None None Bathing suit and Louis Cancun $350.00 Rec. Vuitton purse. Movie tickets/show tickets i.e.. 06/02/2005 Western Union - San Diego David Copperfield (FL) and Phantom of the $200.00 Rec 07/13/2005

YES - 17 :_374Nc DOESA(O- i Po9f 1 o EFTA00234710 A H J 1 15 16 17 18 19 20 VICTIM WITNESS DOB Knowledge or Discussion of Age with JE? Payment for services?/Amount Payment for recruitment Payments made by Taken upstairs by Jane Doe #6 sold JE she was 18. JE responded that h

toys were introduced and used on Ill by JE and NM during the massages. Masturbation YES Ejaculation YES Statements made by On more than one Epstein occasion, JE asked to have sex with him and perform oral sex on him. B. Jane J Doe #7 Jane Doe #8 JE touched breast and vagina. 2-3 separa

S - ...Secret Secret underwear sets. Bathing suit and Louis suit, Western Union - Bra and Panties sets, Cancun S350.00 Rec. Digital camera and Vuitton purse. Movie tickets/show tickets ie. 06/02/2005 Western photography book Union - San Diego David Copperfield (FL) and Phantom of the 5200.00

tlev Engel Klaus Engel Richard P. Eno David R. Epstein Mary Callahan Erdoes Charles W. Ergen Paula E

kil Beshir Ulrich L. Bettermann Erik Behermann Jeffrey L. Bewkes Donald S. Beyer Homi K. Bhabha Neera

Management London Business School United Kingdom Innovation Lab Pierre Goole Senior Executive Vice-President LVMH Moot Hennessy - Louis France Vuitton Sunil Godhwani Chairman and Managing Director Religare Enterprises Ltd India Adi B. Godrej Chairman, The Godrej Group Godrej Industries Ltd I

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2017 1:33 PM To: Lang, Caroline Subject: Re: hello New York sorry to have missed uou O= Th

o: Lang, Caroline Subject: Re: hello New York sorry to have missed uou O= Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 12:54 PM Lan , Caroline < <mailto > wrote: Hi Jeffrey, Will you still be in Paris on Friday? Would you like to visit with me around lunch time th= Chtchoukine exhibition at the Vuitton Foundation?<=u>

o > wrote: Hi Jeffrey, Will you still be in Paris on Friday? Would you like to visit with me around lunch time th= Chtchoukine exhibition at the Vuitton Foundation?<=u> <= classegmail_msg"> please note The information contained in this communication =s confidential, may be attorney-client privileg

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2018 5:26 PM To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: exactly my view. on facebook =1 thought

ffended by a prosecutor's "realistic likelihood of =98vindictiveness' " that tainted the "very in=tiation of proceedings." In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have "power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutiniz=ng any given individual... we

Steve Bannon [as Sent: 6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Fwd: Re: Attachments: image001.png; ima

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we

From: Kathy Ruemm ler Sent: 6/23/2018 5:11:45 PM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Importance: — High Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Zero — and I mean zero — chance that a court wou

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 6/23/2018 3:38:53 PM Subject: Re: Re: Attachments: image002.png; image003.png; image004.png; image001.png Importance

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 6/23/2018 4:01:37 PM To: Kathy Ruemm|cr Sa Subject: Fwd: Re: Attachments: image003.png; image002.png; image001.png; i

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 6/23/2018 5:25:33 PM To: Kathy Ruennler Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: exactly my view. on facebook I thought you might look a

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we