Epstein Secrets

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

hen it enacted this law.3 Though §2422(b) is susceptible to multiple interpretations, it was designed to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to reach beyond the core concern of the statute, a host of problems immediately arise. A simple reading

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

s ttorney's Office Southern District of Florida Jeffrey Epstein Dear We write as counsel to Jeffrey Eps

very special thanks to generous support gil et”ey Epstein. for making this meeting happen. This meeting wa

paying bribes to Victor Fajardo, former education secretary from 1994 to 2000, in exchange for contracts with the department between 1999 and 2000. Fajardo pleaded guilty in 2002 to extorting some US$4.3 million from contractors doing business with his agency. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS: Nobel Prize winning p

RENATO C. STABILE ada•Okoltostaa. corn FAITH A. FRIEDMAN Mearnageskeurstet teen BY FEDERAL EXPRESS ear T essrs. oman, T enc e an July 6, 2007 rey Epstein uric and Ms. Villafaila: HONE I/ zJ 7370400 FAcSIMILE 421211388.6102 We %Tice as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on Ju

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

hen it enacted this law.5 Though §2422(b) is susceptible to multiple interpretations, it was designed to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. I stretched to reach beyond the core concern of the statute, a host of problems immediately arise. A simple reading o

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. I stretched to rea

FAcSIMILE 421211388.6102 We %Tice as counsel to Jeffrey Epstein to follow-up on our meeting on June 26,

paying bribes to Victor Fajardo, former education secretary from 1994 to 2000, in exchange for contracts with the department between 1999 and 2000. Fajardo pleaded guilty in 2002 to extorting some USS4.3 million from contractors doing business with his agency. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS: Nobel Prize winning p

w best to use the broad discretion you enjoy in choosing whether to prosecute. In this regard, we suggest that having a greater understanding of who Jeffrey Epstein is as a person may help inform how best to proceed. Jeffrey Epstein was raised in a middle class neighborhood in Brooklyn, New York, by hardworking

hen it enacted this law.5 Though §2422(b) is susceptible to multiple interpretations, it was designed to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to reach beyond the core concern of the statute, a host of problems immediately arise. A simple reading

igned to address a specific a problem with which Mr. Epstein's case has nothing in common. If stretched to re

ERAL EXPRESS TELEPHONE FACSIMILE July 6, 2007 Jeffrey Sloman, Esq., First Assistant United States Attor

paying bribes to Victor Fajardo, former education secretary from 1994 to 2000, in exchange for contracts with the department between 1999 and 2000. Fajardo pleaded guilty in 2002 to extorting some USS4.3 million from contractors doing business with his agency. U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS: Nobel Prize winning p

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2009 Page 1 of 22 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-cv-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON __________ .! JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE N

13) (the "Notice of Conditional Reliance"), With Incorporated Memorandum of Law. An expeditious ruling by this Court is now critical. 3 In support, Epstein states: 1 DE 114 and DE 121 were stricken because they were incorrectly filed pursuant to the Court's Order consolidating cases. Plaintiff refilled

ocket 07/21/2009 Page 4 of 22 Page4 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Response In Opposition to Plaintiff, Ca

; Count XXXI (Sexual Battery), '][199.) 13 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 216 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2009 Page 14 of 22 Page 14 See Fajardo v. Pierce County, 2009 WL 1765756 (W.D. Wash. 2009)(allegations of specific disorders amount to more than garden variety disorders and thus Plaintif

09 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. _______________ ./ Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591,09-8065

d records from a "CMA" designation? Then, on May 20, 2009, C.M.A. capitulated and filed her Notice of Withdrawal of Previously Raised Objections to Epstein's Motion to Compel and/or Identify C.M.A. in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discover

6,09-80802,09-81092 --------------~/ Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintifrs Response In Opposit

1, 67, 73, 79, 85, 91, 97, 103, 109, 115, 121, 127, 133, 139, 145, 151, 157, 163, 169, 175, 181, 187, 193; Count XXXI (Sexual Battery), iJl99.) See Fajardo v. Pierce County, 2009 WL 1765756 (W.D. Wash. 2009)(allegations of specific disorders amount to more than garden variety disorders and thus Plaintif

09 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. _______________ / Related cases: 08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656

ent questioning of their past sexual histories in order to prevent the Defendant and a jury from properly analyzing their damages as it pertains to Epstein while, at the same time, blinding the jury from instances in each of the Plaintiffs' lives where psychological, mental, physical and sexual trauma m

0591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092 I Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe 2-8, Respo

weigh this evidence. Even so, at this juncture, it is without question that same is discoverable. Admissibility can be handled on another date. See Fajardo v. Pierce County, 2009 WL 1765756 (W.D. Wash. 2009)(allegations of specific disorders amount to more than garden variety disorders and thus Plainti