Epstein Secrets

/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. / COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTIONS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this M

FENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON EDWARDS' WAIVER OF ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND WORK PRODUCT PROTECTIONS Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), submits this Memorandum of Law as to the Doctrines of Waiver of Attorney-Client and Work Product protections as claimed by Edwards and at issue

OUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT

on to one person, the party who made the disclosure asserts the privilege against another person who wants the information." Deliwood Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., 128 F.3d 1122, 1126 (7th Cir. 1997). The lack of merit to "selective waiver" theory in American jurisprudence is illustrated by a series of

From: Lesley Groff -cEl=a- To: Carolyn Rangel -c t- Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 23:49:44 +0000 ah! thanks for the info...! On Mar 1, 2017, at 6:43 PM, Carolyn Rangel wrote: Do you think he'll go? The h

rcavibted From: Lesley Groff <a Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 6:34 PM To: Carolyn Rangel Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein thank you!! I will put in Jeffrey's calendar.. On Feb 28, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Carolyn Rangel wrote: July 3 through 7 Carolyn Rangel President, DeepakChopra LLC 2013 Costa Del Mar

=a- To: Carolyn Rangel -c t- Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 23:49:44 +0000 ah! thank

olely for the use of the rodindual or entity to whom they are addressed. ll you have receved cowl n CM), pleasenotify the 'Mem manager. Tho message Cargill"; confidentiat information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee youshould not disseminate, dombiAo or co

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wed 5/6/2009 6:02:00 PM Subject: Re: G5 offer yes On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM, wrote: Here is the final Letter of Intent that Darren

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wed 5/6/2009 6:02:00 PM Subject: Re: G5

To: From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Wed 5/6/2009 6:02:00 PM Subject:

er yes On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:15 PM, wrote: Here is the final Letter of Intent that Darren has approved. Can I have your approval to submit to Cargill? Larry Big savings on Dell's most popular laptops. Now starting at $449! EFTA_R1_00202514 EFTA01827396

To: [email protected] From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 9:29:56 PM Subject: Re: GV offer update ok On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:21 PM, a wrote: Larry, Its being ran up the flag pole.

To: [email protected] From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 9:29:56 PM Subject: Re: GV

To: [email protected] From: Jeffrey Epstein Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 9:29:56 PM Subject:

50K), buyer pays for labor, discrepancies to be paid by seller, Usual discrepancies total 250K for 96 month inspection. We also will recommend that Cargill provide us a cost estimate for mid life engine inspection. —since Engines are due in 250 hours for mid life inspection, we can obtain Rolls Royce no

From: To: "jeevacationggmail.com" <jeevacationggmail.com> Subject: GV Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:24 +0000 Jeffrey, the following message is from Sean: I have an idea, what if we offered Cargill a lease back. We buy it now and let them keep for a specific period

tionggmail.com> Subject: GV Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:32:24 +0000 Jeffrey, the following message is from Sean: I have an idea, what if we offered Cargill a lease back. We buy it now and let them keep for a specific period of time and then we get it back off of lease and put it in for Mr Es interior. I

To: • ail.com[jeevacation@gmaitcom] From: Sent: Wed 5/27/2009 1:32:24 PM Subject: GV Jeffrey, the following message is from Sean: I have an idea, what if we offered Cargill a lease back. We buy it now and let them keep for a specific period

tion@gmaitcom] From: Sent: Wed 5/27/2009 1:32:24 PM Subject: GV Jeffrey, the following message is from Sean: I have an idea, what if we offered Cargill a lease back. We buy it now and let them keep for a specific period of time and then we get it back off of lease and put it in for Mr E's interior.

From: Gino Yu as Sent: 12/17/2016 2:43:49 AM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Fwd: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD) Attachm

A. The Koch Brothers are not just two grumpy men -- they are a political party. Koch Industries is the second biggest private company in the US after Cargill. They operate public and secretive political entities in 32 states and dole out more than $500 million each political cycle to various entities in th

From: Gino Yu Sent: 12/17/2016 12:35:06 PM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD) Attachme

. The Koch Brothers are not just two grumpy men -- they are a political party. Koch Industries is the second biggest private company in the US after Cargill. They operate public and secretive political entities in 32 states and dole out more than $500 million each political cycle to various entities in th