9
Shared Docs
9
Same-Page
9 / 9
Mentions
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
own, EFTA00070226 MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information EFTA00072146 UBS acknowle
le above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares EFTA00069432 So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? As
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
nversion schedule above AGAIN: that would translate post reverse to the 13Da: 87,104,691 shares So what happened to the 37 billion shares of common Barred Schwartz, Linda Grable and Grable II sold Viable in the 2014 SPA and did not have the authorized shares to do so and verified in the 2014 Viable 13D???? EFT
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
Entities connected to both Barred Schwartz and the SEC LA
Chris Dilorio
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONSEC NY
ORGANIZATIONCerberus et al
PERSONAegis
ORGANIZATIONCemtrex/Govil et al
ORGANIZATIONDougie Large
PERSONFife et al
PERSONVicon
ORGANIZATIONDick Best
PERSONMehraban
PERSONNorberg
PERSONPasquinelli
PERSONOppenheimer AML
ORGANIZATIONBBH AML
ORGANIZATIONFarmingdale
LOCATIONMs Mehtaban
PERSONBag Man Fife
PERSON
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSONBag Man Ayrton
PERSON