Epstein Secrets

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

sis and estimates based on Greenhill Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, January 2018; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, July 2014; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Update, March 2009; and Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst Guide to the Secondary Market, June 2017. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum 20 EFTA013

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

sis and estimates based on Greenhill Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, January 2018; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, July 2014; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Update, March 2009; and Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst Guide to the Secondary Market, June 2017. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum 20 EFTA013

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

sis and estimates based on Greenhill Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, January 2018; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, July 2014; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Update, March 2009; and Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst Guide to the Secondary Market, June 2017. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum 20 EFTA013

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

sis and estimates based on Greenhill Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, January 2018; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, July 2014; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Update, March 2009; and Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst Guide to the Secondary Market, June 2017. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum 20 EFTA013

mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund

sis and estimates based on Greenhill Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, January 2018; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Trends & Outlook, July 2014; Cogent Partners Secondary Market Update, March 2009; and Dow Jones Private Equity Analyst Guide to the Secondary Market, June 2017. Confidential Private Placement Memorandum 20 EFTA013