Epstein Secrets

ining party will be subject to the same action again."' Federal Election Comm'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449, 462 (2007) (quoting Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 17 (1998)). Neither of those circumstances exists here. 2 For example, the United States has disputed throughout these proceedings tha

y judgment action, it is well-settled that the declaratory judgment act permits adjudication only when there is an "actual" case or controversy. See Bush Truck Leasing v. Dynamex, No. 11-80026-CIV, 2011 WL 5508813, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 9, 2011) ("The declaratory judgment is an all-purpose remedy designed to permi

ining party will be subject to the same action again."' Federal Election Comm'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449, 462 (2007) (quoting Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 17 (1998)). Neither of those circumstances exists here. 2 For example, the United States has disputed throughout these proceedings tha

y judgment action, it is well-settled that the declaratory judgment act permits adjudication only when there is an "actual" case or controversy. See Bush Truck Leasing v. Dynamex, No. 11-80026-CIV, 2011 WL 5508813, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 9, 2011) ("The declaratory judgment is an all-purpose remedy designed to permi

ining party will be subject to the same action again."' Federal Election Commin v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449, 462 (2007) (quoting Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 17 (1998)). Neither of those circumstances exists here. 2 For example, the United States has disputed throughout these proceedings tha

y judgment action, it is well-settled that the declaratory judgment act permits adjudication only when there is an "actual" case or controversy. See Bush Truck Leasing v. Dynamex, No. 11-80026-CIV, 2011 WL 5508813, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Nov. 9, 2011) ("The declaratory judgment is an all-purpose remedy designed to permi