Epstein Secrets

markable asylum case is a warning to immigration board members that even their unpublished decisions are being scrutinized, former immigration judge Jeffrey Chase told The Washington Post via email. "In the past, such decisions flew under the radar," Chase wrote. Other critics said Barr's move should concern

e to executive branch departments, they will overturn decisions found to be made with flimsy justification. Dana Leigh Marks, president emeritus at the National Association of Immigration Judges who currently presides over immigration cases, said that can result in judges not knowing what guidance to follow. "The problem for those of us in

markable asylum case is a warning to immigration board members that even their unpublished decisions are being scrutinized, former immigration judge Jeffrey Chase told The Washington Post via email. "In the past, such decisions flew under the radar," Chase wrote. Other critics said Barr's move should concern

e to executive branch departments, they will overturn decisions found to be made with flimsy justification. Dana Leigh Marks, president emeritus at the National Association of Immigration Judges who currently presides over immigration cases, said that can result in judges not knowing what guidance to follow. "The problem for those of us in

markable asylum case is a warning to immigration board members that even their unpublished decisions are being scrutinized, former immigration judge Jeffrey Chase told The Washington Post via email. "In the past, such decisions flew under the radar," Chase wrote. Other critics said Barr's move should concern

e to executive branch departments, they will overturn decisions found to be made with flimsy justification. Dana Leigh Marks, president emeritus at the National Association of Immigration Judges who currently presides over immigration cases, said that can result in judges not knowing what guidance to follow. "The problem for those of us in