Epstein Secrets

xpression for 13 EFTA00071572 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D

xpression for 13 EFTA00075455 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D

xpression for 13 EFTA00088689 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

g information of BOP employees under Exemption 7(F). See Jordan, 668 F.3d at 1198 (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP Supermax roster); Pinson v. Dep 't opustice, 236 F. Supp. 3d 388, 370 (D.D.C. 2017) (upholding application of Exemption 7(F) to BOP assignment rosters). IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its D