Epstein Secrets

. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Search for Responsive Records 5 III. BOP's Withholdings Were Proper 6 IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its Duty to Segregate and Release Any Non-Exempt Information. 22 CONCLUSION 23

xpression for 13 EFTA00071572 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Search for Responsive Records 5 III. BOP's Withholdings Were Proper 6 IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its Duty to Segregate and Release Any Non-Exempt Information. 22 CONCLUSION 23

xpression for 13 EFTA00075455 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

. The Times's FOIA Requests and This Action 3 ARGUMENT 4 I. FOIA and the Summary Judgment Standard 4 II. BOP Conducted an Adequate Search for Responsive Records 5 III. BOP's Withholdings Were Proper 6 IV. BOP Has Satisfied Its Duty to Segregate and Release Any Non-Exempt Information. 22 CONCLUSION 23

xpression for 13 EFTA00088689 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co