Epstein Secrets

purposes. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tarta

criminal proceedings. Plaintiff's argument that disclosure pursuant to a protective order would foreclose any possible interference with Noel, see P. MOL at 13, incorrectly conflates disclosure to criminal defendants pursuant to a protective order with public disclosure under FOIA. The Capone Declara

purposes. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tarta

criminal proceedings. Plaintiff's argument that disclosure pursuant to a protective order would foreclose any possible interference with Noel, see P. MOL at 13, incorrectly conflates disclosure to criminal defendants pursuant to a protective order with public disclosure under FOIA. The Capone Declara

enforcement purposes. See Supp. Decl. ¶ 29. ii. Disclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The and Supplemental Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prose

criminal proceedings. Plaintiff's argument that disclosure pursuant to a protective order would foreclose any possible interference with Noel, see P. MOL at 13, incorrectly conflates disclosure to criminal defendants pursuant to a protective order with public disclosure under FOIA. The Declarations e