Epstein Secrets

emonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and interference with ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooker v. Bureau of 4 Through counsel, plaintiff has also agreed not to challenge the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to such information in records withhel

gh such use of such items was generally known). Here, for example, certain of the reports prepared during the course of BOP's investigation include Security Threat Group ("STG") designations, which are an enhanced monitoring technique used by BOP. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶¶ 20, 23. As another example, the August

emonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and interference with ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooker v. Bureau of 4 Through counsel, plaintiff has also agreed not to challenge the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to such information in records withhel

gh such use of such items was generally known). Here, for example, certain of the reports prepared during the course of BOP's investigation include Security Threat Group ("STG") designations, which are an enhanced monitoring technique used by BOP. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶¶ 20, 23. As another example, the August

emonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and interference with ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooker v. Bureau of Through counsel, plaintiff has also agreed not to challenge the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to such information in records withheld

gh such use of such items was generally known). Here, for example, certain of the reports prepared during the course of BOP's investigation include Security Threat Group ("STG") designations, which are an enhanced monitoring technique used by BOP. See Supp. Decl. ¶¶ 20, 23. As another example, the August 14, 2019 l