Epstein Secrets

emonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and interference with ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooker v. Bureau of 4 Through counsel, plaintiff has also agreed not to challenge the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to such information in records withhel

N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (upholding application of 7(E) over specific details of use of cameras and license plate readers, even though such use

emonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and interference with ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooker v. Bureau of 4 Through counsel, plaintiff has also agreed not to challenge the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to such information in records withhel

N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Int'l Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (upholding application of 7(E) over specific details of use of cameras and license plate readers, even though such use

emonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and interference with ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooker v. Bureau of Through counsel, plaintiff has also agreed not to challenge the application of Exemptions 7(E) and 7(F) to such information in records withheld

.N.Y. 2017) (quoting Allard K. Lowenstein Intl Human Rights Project v. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 626 F.3d 678, 682 (2d Cir. 2010)); see NYCLU v. DHS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289, 292 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (upholding application of 7(E) over specific details of use of cameras and license plate readers, even though such use