Epstein Secrets

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

gh such use of such items was generally known). Here, for example, certain of the reports prepared during the course of BOP's investigation include Security Threat Group ("STG") designations, which are an enhanced monitoring technique used by BOP. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶¶ 20, 23. As another example, the August

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

gh such use of such items was generally known). Here, for example, certain of the reports prepared during the course of BOP's investigation include Security Threat Group ("STG") designations, which are an enhanced monitoring technique used by BOP. See Supp. Christenson Decl. ¶¶ 20, 23. As another example, the August

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

gh such use of such items was generally known). Here, for example, certain of the reports prepared during the course of BOP's investigation include Security Threat Group ("STG") designations, which are an enhanced monitoring technique used by BOP. See Supp. Decl. ¶¶ 20, 23. As another example, the August 14, 2019 l