3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
ork with press. Is noam conversant with category theory as a notation for theories. ( any science of relationships objects collections, including mathemati=s). .. is language the equivalent of a subse= of the sound/time domain , organized as a coherent shape space. exa=tly the same as an image as a cohere
lent of a subse= of the sound/time domain , organized as a coherent shape space. exa=tly the same as an image as a coherent shape space in the light/visu=l domain. both including a time component? . permitted morphism in the space would map to sentences. as they w=uld mappings to objects in visual space. i
ork with press. Is noam conversant with category theory as a notation for theories. ( any science of relationships objects collections, including mathemati=s). .. is language the equivalent of a subse= of the sound/time domain , organized as a coherent shape space. exa=tly the same as an image as a cohere
lent of a subse= of the sound/time domain , organized as a coherent shape space. exa=tly the same as an image as a coherent shape space in the light/visu=l domain. both including a time component? . permitted morphism in the space would map to sentences. as they w=uld mappings to objects in visual space. E
ork with press. Is noam conversant with category theory as a notation for theories. ( any science of relationships objects collections, including mathemati=s). .. is language the equivalent of a subse= of the sound/time domain , organized as a coherent shape space. exa=tly the same as an image as a cohere
lent of a subse= of the sound/time domain , organized as a coherent shape space. exa=tly the same as an image as a coherent shape space in the light/visu=l domain. both including a time component? . permitted morphism in the space would map to sentences. as they w=uld mappings to objects in visual space. i
Entities connected to both mathemati=s and visu=l domain