5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Entities connected to both DaVinci Portfolio and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund
Glendower
LOCATIONInternal Rate of Return
ORGANIZATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATION
North America
LOCATION
Milan
LOCATION
Cambridge University
ORGANIZATION
Norway
LOCATION
Hungary
LOCATION
Belgium
LOCATION
Estonia
LOCATION
Denmark
LOCATION
Finland
LOCATIONPretoria
LOCATION
George Soros
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Romania
LOCATION
Lithuania
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
Elena
PERSON