5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Entities connected to both the Glendower SOF Team's and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund
Glendower
LOCATIONCharles Smith
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSONAdam Graev
PERSON
Deutsche Bank
ORGANIZATIONSOF Team
ORGANIZATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATIONCarlo Pirzio-Biroli
PERSON
United Kingdom
LOCATIONGallo & Co.
ORGANIZATION
George Soros
PERSONCIBC Oppenheimer
ORGANIZATIONChi Cheung
PERSONDeirdre Davies
PERSONPaul Capital
ORGANIZATIONAccess Fund
ORGANIZATION
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSON
General Electric
ORGANIZATIONGlendower Capital SOF IV
ORGANIZATION
United States
LOCATION