Epstein Secrets

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

f Justice, M8 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2 011) 9, 10, 21, 22 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20, 21 Kansi v. U.S. Depst of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998) 8 Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 199 7) 7 Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17

released, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeaL See, e.g.,Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D.D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S. Dep 't of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00071567 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 30 (

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

f Justice, M8 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2 011) 9, 10, 21, 22 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20, 21 Kansi v. U.S. Depst of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998) 8 Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 199 7) 7 Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17

released, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeaL See, e.g.,Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D.D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S. Dep 't of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00075450 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 30 (

S. Dep 't of State v. Washington Post Co., 456 U.S. 595 (1982) 17 United States ex rel. Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951) 16 United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237 (2d Cir. 1989) 14 W. Journalism Ctr. v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 926 F. Supp. 189 (D.D.C. 1996) 11 Williams v. F.B.I., 730 F.2d

f Justice, M8 F.3d 1188 (10th Cir. 2 011) 9, 10, 21, 22 Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dept of Commerce, 337 F. Supp. 2d 146 (D.D.C. 2004) 20, 21 Kansi v. U.S. Depst of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42 (D.D.C. 1998) 8 Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23 (D.D.C. 199 7) 7 Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17

released, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeaL See, e.g.,Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D.D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S. Dep 't of Justice, 11 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00088684 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 15 of 30 (

t matter upon which professional advice is sought, and the confidentiality of the expression for which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwimmer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

eased, could interfere with post-trial criminal proceedings, such as an appeal. See, e.g., Kidder v. FBI, 517 F. Supp. 2d 17, 27-28 (D. D.C. 2007); Kansi v. U.S Dep't ofJustice, II F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D. D.C. 1998). 8 EFTA00069319 As a threshold matter, all of the records withheld by FBI pursuant t