Back to Network
the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark
ORGANIZATIONCambridge Associates Secondary Fund
ORGANIZATION5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (148)
Entities connected to both the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund
Glendower
LOCATION16 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
SOF IV
ORGANIZATION6 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Malta
LOCATION6 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
United Kingdom
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Milan
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Cambridge University
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Norway
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Hungary
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Belgium
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Estonia
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Denmark
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Finland
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Pretoria
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
George Soros
PERSON5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Michael Douglas
PERSON5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
European Union
ORGANIZATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Romania
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Lithuania
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Cyprus
LOCATION5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge
Elena
PERSON5 w/ the·5 w/ Cambridge