Epstein Secrets

SCF tea RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

performance 6 not a prediction ol the !awe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower fads dnd there can be no assurance that SOF rtr will achieve compared° resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Tea

SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erlormance 6 not a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower FifidS dnd there can be no assurance that SOF rtr will acheve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Tea

CF lando Re% In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

performance 6 not a prediction ol the Um performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no assurance that SOF rtr will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te