5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
nced by investors in the Fund. Past performance of the SOF Funds is not a prediction of future performance. Both SOF and SOF D are invested in the DaVinci Portfolio — a well diversified portfolio of 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capit
Entities connected to both the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark and DaVinci Portfolio
Glendower
LOCATIONInternal Rate of Return
ORGANIZATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATION
Malta
LOCATION
North America
LOCATION
Cambridge University
ORGANIZATION
Norway
LOCATION
Hungary
LOCATION
Belgium
LOCATION
Estonia
LOCATION
Denmark
LOCATION
Finland
LOCATIONPretoria
LOCATION
George Soros
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Romania
LOCATION
Lithuania
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
Elena
PERSON