5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30, 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout-lik
assets alongside private equity sponsors where the Glendower SOF Team has an angle. More specifically: .>Z Informational advantage, by leveraging the Glendower SOF Team's relationships with over 180 Fund Sponsors17 and its investments in more than 350 fund interests worldwide.18 \Z Relationship with sellers, by work
Entities connected to both the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark and the Glendower SOF Team's
Glendower
LOCATIONAdam Graev
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSONCharles Smith
PERSON
Deutsche Bank
ORGANIZATIONSOF D. SOF II
ORGANIZATIONSOF Team
ORGANIZATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATION
United Kingdom
LOCATIONCarlo Pirzio-Biroli
PERSONJoshua C. Glaser
PERSONCIBC Oppenheimer
ORGANIZATION
General Electric
ORGANIZATIONPaul Capital
ORGANIZATIONAccess Fund
ORGANIZATION
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSONChi Cheung
PERSONDeirdre Davies
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
North America
LOCATION