Epstein Secrets

SC, tea RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erformance is not a prediction ol the !awe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds dnd there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve compared° resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Tea

SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erformance is riot a predicton ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track rocad ci the Glendower SOF Tea

SCF tea RYP1 In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erformance is not a predictor ol the vivre performance et SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds dnd there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te

SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erformance is riot a predicton ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track rocad ci the Glendower SOF Tea

SCF IA& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erformance is net a prediction ol the !awe performance or SOF. SOF D, SCF II. SCF III or any other Glendower rinds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any Impel results will be achieved. biA is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Tea

SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

erformance is riot a predicton ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track rocad ci the Glendower SOF Tea

SC, tea 11e1 In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

performance is iv a prediction ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower ildidSdnd there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te

C• tedo RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

performance is iv a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower rinds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te

C, •nta RYP1 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

performance is not a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower Ands and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Te

SCF 1st& Mai In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridge Associates Global Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. Again, the SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 3: Buyout•hke r

performance 6 not a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record el the Glendower SOF Te