Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners sea 'S. • wee (maw 1pw Ern' ilt sac a

EJASEe that any target resultswill be acreenal DPI = Cearlautions to Paid-In Capital. RVOI = Residual Value to Pawlan Caprtal. TVPI = Total Value to Paidan Capital '4 Source' Cambridge Asecciatee GOD& Buyout eenChinalk as of September 30. 2017. The information reflects a companson of SOF. SOF D. SOF II Et SOF

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to hinged partners • dppti (maw 1pw 61 ash • 1P:0r • ; Sac

MEd% or that any target results will be acnieved DPI = Cearbutions to Paid-In Capital. RVOI = Residual Value to Pawlan Capful. TVPI = Total Value to Paidan Capital '4 Source' Cambridge Associates GOD& Buyout eenchmaik as of September 30. 2017. The int ormaeon reflects a comparison of SOF. SOF D. SOF II Et SCf

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tanned partners sea 10% • claw (mane BC. 1pw .r3d wilt

% Ex that any target resultswill be acheved j1 DPI = Prarbutions to Paid-In Capital. RVOI = Residual Value to Paelan Capital. TVPI = Total Value to Paidan Capital '4 Source' Cambridge Associates GOD& Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. The int ormaeon reflects a comparison of SOF. SOF D. SOF II Et SOF

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tended pariahs • upte. Goan.. 1pw Ern' ilt • Wax, • ; sa

fo3EJASEe that any target resultswill be acreeitel DPI = Derbubons to Pardin Capital. RVPI a Residual Value to Pagan Capital. TVPI = Total Value to Paidan Capital '4 Source' Cambridge Associates GOO& Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. The 'Norma/an reflects a companson of SOF. SOF D. SOF II SOF III p

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked partners • Opt* (this Len—Itito • wear • ; W SO

e MOWS* that any target resultswill be acreertxt DPI = Cwarbutions to Paid-In Caput. RVOI = Reerdual Value to Pa elan Capital. TVPI = Total Value to Paidan Capital '4 Source' Cambridge Associates GOD& Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. The information reflects a companson of SOF. SOF D. SOF II SOF III

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tanked partners • Um* coat Leletn1d wag • WIALIC • ; sa

esults* that any target resultswill be achieved DPI = Cearloutions to Paid-In Capital. RVOI = Residual Value to Pagan Capital. TVPI = Total Value to Paidan Capital '4 Source' Cambridge Asacoates GOD& Buyout Benchmark as of September 30. 2017. The information reflects a comparison of SOF. SOF D. SOF II Et SCf