Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners sea 'S. • wee (maw 1pw Ern' ilt sac a

asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Team Internam presented in this chart is based on the unaudted issues of SOF. SOF D. 9CF 11 and Syne, of Seaentat 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in COnpn

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked partners sea • :new (mann Icor "dal*, • 1.6.61.1e

o asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any Impel results will be achieved. biA is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Team Internam presented in this chart IS based on the unaudted issues of SOF. SOF D. 9CF 11 and Syne, of September 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in conp

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tanned partners sea 10% • claw (mane BC. 1pw .r3d wilt

asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Team Internam presented in this chart is based on the unaudted issues of SOF. SOF D. 9CF II and SOF III as of Standby 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in C

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds'. Net multiple to limited partners SO% • Cava (mann Isar ad wilt • 1a..0a

asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Team Internam presented in this chart is based on the unaudted issues of SOF. SOF a 9CF II and SOF of as of September 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in C