Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

II and SOF III as of Seaember 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in 0/npriCtOn and should be read and Ity,Ow03 in conjunction with Appendix 5 Irripatant Pet matte Information which sets forth amongst other throe: important information regarding the performance awaited above Confidential Prrvate Placement Memorandum 9 C

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

II and SOF III as of Seaember 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in 0/npriCtOn and should be read and Ity,Ow03 in conjunction with Appendix 5 Irripatant Pet matte Information which sets forth amongst other throe: important information regarding the performance awaited above Confidential Prrvate Placement Memorandum 9 C

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

II and SOF III as of Seaember 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in 0/npriCtOn and should be read and Ity,Ow03 in conjunction with Appendix 5 Irripatant Pet matte Information which sets forth amongst other throe: important information regarding the performance awaited above Confidential Prrvate Placement Memorandum 9 C

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to hinged partners • dppti (maw 1pw 61 ash • 1P:0r • ; Sac

F 1l and SOF It as of Se,ternber 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in COnpne(Cn and *hand be lead and rav,Owed in conjunction with Appendix 5 Irripatant Pet matte Information which sets forth amongst other throe important information regarding the performance desaited above Confidential Prrvate Placement Memorandum 9 C