Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

anation presented n Exhibt 2's based an the unausisa results of SOF, SOF D. SOF II and SOF III as of September 30. 2017 ", Past performance IS net a DfeCktell of the future performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III but is included to demonstrate the track record or the Glendower SOF Team There can be no

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners sea 'S. • wee (maw 1pw Ern' ilt sac a

ation presented n Exhibt 2's based an the unauceted results of SOF, SOF D. SOF II and SOF III as of September 30. 2017 to Past performance is rat a DfeCktell of the haute performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III tow is included to demcnwrwe the track record of the Glenckreree SOF Team There can be no

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

anation presented n Exhibt 2's based an the unausisa results of SOF, SOF D. SOF II and SOF III as of September 30. 2017 ", Past performance IS net a DfeCktell of the future performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III but is included to demonstrate the track record or the Glendower SOF Team There can be no

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

anation presented n Exhibt 2's based an the unausisa results of SOF, SOF D. SOF II and SOF III as of September 30. 2017 ", Past performance IS net a DfeCktell of the future performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III but is included to demonstrate the track record or the Glendower SOF Team There can be no

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tanned partners sea 10% • claw (mane BC. 1pw .r3d wilt

mation presented n Exhibt 21s based al the outpaced results of SOF, SOF D. SOF II and SOF III as of September 30. 2017 ,4 Past performance is net a DfeCktell of the Mute performance of SOF, SOF D. SOF II or SOF III tow is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glick:Wow SOF Team There can be no a