Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

14 1 a 00 06 it. • I: 14 04 OS /6 SOF 0 iVrt peat I. SO; :TI: I I, DP e II 904 6 I 3.• OH • 0 env* on ruin Pee r sce **CPI SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridg

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

14 1 a 00 06 it. • I: 14 04 OS /6 SOF 0 iVrt peat I. SO; :TI: I I, DP e II 904 6 I 3.• OH • 0 env* on ruin Pee r sce **CPI SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridg

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

14 1 a 00 06 it. • I: 14 04 OS /6 SOF 0 iVrt peat I. SO; :TI: I I, DP e II 904 6 I 3.• OH • 0 env* on ruin Pee r sce **CPI SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridg

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tended pariahs • upte. Goan.. 1pw Ern' ilt • Wax, • ; sa

• ! II 14 $5 /6 SOF 0 1V11: .50; :Slit, 1X• e II 904 TIM: I 3.• OH I . yr te *C9 '10 11 IS 13 11 epee on red eau f: SCE Ian LA SCF ha& RYPI In Exhibit 3. each of SOF. SOF D. SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout funds reported in the Cambridg