Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners so% 'S. 104. 20if " • n. 64 • :Apt

o asswance that SOF W will achieve compared° resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Team IMormatcc presented in this chart is based on the unaudted issues of SOF. SOF D. 9CF 11 and SOF III as of September 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners SO% ASS 1011 'S. • CIpaa Coat low ad.

ssurance that SOF rtr will achieve compared° resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Team IMormatcc presented in this chart is based on the unaudted Krauts d SOF. SOF a 9CF 11 and SOF III as of Seaembet 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in CO

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners sod la% 1011 'S. 200. in • 53, 0%

assurance that SOF IV will achieve comparate resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Team IMormatcc presented in this chart is based on the unaudted issues of SCF. SCF a 9CF 11 and SDP III as of September 30.2017 and should be read and reviewed in