Epstein Secrets

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners so% 'S. 104. 20if " • n. 64 • :Apt

erformance is not a prediction ol the !awe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds dnd there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve compared° resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Tea

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

erformance is riot a predicton ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track rocad ci the Glendower SOF Tea

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to limited partners sea 'S. • wee (maw 1pw Ern' ilt sac a

erformance is not a predictor ol the vivre performance et SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds dnd there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

erformance is riot a predicton ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track rocad ci the Glendower SOF Tea

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked partners sea • :new (mann Icor "dal*, • 1.6.61.1e

erformance is net a prediction ol the !awe performance or SOF. SOF D, SCF II. SCF III or any other Glendower rinds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any Impel results will be achieved. biA is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Tea

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to linked pawners ¶00 19* • upon Urann Low .r3d wilt WC 2

erformance is riot a predicton ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track rocad ci the Glendower SOF Tea

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to hinged partners • dppti (maw 1pw 61 ash • 1P:0r • ; Sac

performance is iv a prediction ol the Volt performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SCf III or any other Glendower ildidSdnd there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiple to tanned partners sea 10% • claw (mane BC. 1pw .r3d wilt

performance is iv a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower rinds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record ci the Glendower SOF Te

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds'. Net multiple to limited partners SO% • Cava (mann Isar ad wilt • 1a..0a

performance is not a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower Ands and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparable resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record of the Glendower SOF Te

ember 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR. DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark " 34 37 Secondary funds: Net IRR to limited partners Secondary funds'. Net multiple to limited partners sod 1011 'S. 203. in • 53, 0% 64

performance 6 not a prediction ol the Uwe performance of SOF. SOF D, SOF II. SOF III or any other Glendower finds and there can be no asswance that SOF W will achieve comparatle resifts or that any target results will be achieved. but is included to demonstrate the track record el the Glendower SOF Te