5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
F, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III (collectively the "SOF Funds" or the "SOF Program") with aggregate commitments of US$3 billion. More specifically: \Z SOF,3 the initial SOF Program secondary fund that was formed in 2006 and held a final close in early 2007 with a US$565 million pool of commitments. )Z
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
F, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III (collectively the "SOF Funds" or the "SOF Program") with aggregate commitments of US$3 billion. More specifically: \Z SOF,3 the initial SOF Program secondary fund that was formed in 2006 and held a final close in early 2007 with a US$565 million pool of commitments. )Z
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
F, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III (collectively the "SOF Funds" or the "SOF Program") with aggregate commitments of US$3 billion. More specifically: \Z SOF,3 the initial SOF Program secondary fund that was formed in 2006 and held a final close in early 2007 with a US$565 million pool of commitments. )Z
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
F, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III (collectively the "SOF Funds" or the "SOF Program") with aggregate commitments of US$3 billion. More specifically: \Z SOF,3 the initial SOF Program secondary fund that was formed in 2006 and held a final close in early 2007 with a US$565 million pool of commitments. )Z
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
F, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III (collectively the "SOF Funds" or the "SOF Program") with aggregate commitments of US$3 billion. More specifically: \Z SOF,3 the initial SOF Program secondary fund that was formed in 2006 and held a final close in early 2007 with a US$565 million pool of commitments. )Z
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Entities connected to both SOF,3 and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund
Deirdre Davies
PERSONAdam Graev
PERSONCharles Smith
PERSON
Deutsche Bank
ORGANIZATION
Prince Charles
PERSONGlendower
LOCATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATIONChi Cheung
PERSON
Estonia
LOCATION
Denmark
LOCATION
Finland
LOCATIONPretoria
LOCATION
George Soros
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSON
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Romania
LOCATION
Lithuania
LOCATION
Cyprus
LOCATION
Elena
PERSON
Northern Ireland
LOCATION