Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
r the firm had acquired multiple affiliates with separate Market Participant Identifiers (MPID's) and the orders were associated with those MPID's" Bull Shit. The period covered in the complaint related to the 1.5 billion+ mis marked tickets was 2013-2016. The only possibility: KCG. The SEC facilitated g
CM MPID is and always has been NITE. VIRT didn't trade OTCM money laundering shells prior to the SEC facilitated fraud on the public acquisition of Knight/KCG:NITE either. Then again, the SEC KNOWS exactly WHO the customer in the FINRA complaint is. They also know the stocks in the trades. So, yes: the custom
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
r the firm had acquired multiple affiliates with separate Market Participant Identifiers (MPID's) and the orders were associated with those MPID's" Bull Shit. The period covered in the complaint related to the 1.5 billion+ mis marked tickets was 2013-2016. The only possibility: KCG. The SEC facilitated g
CM MPID is and always has been NITE. VIRT didn't trade OTCM money laundering shells prior to the SEC facilitated fraud on the public acquisition of Knight/KCG:NITE either. Then again, the SEC KNOWS exactly WHO the customer in the FINRA complaint is. They also know the stocks in the trades. So, yes: the custom
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
r the firm had acquired multiple affiliates with separate Market Participant Identifiers (MPID's) and the orders were associated with those MPID's" Bull Shit. The period covered in the complaint related to the 1.5 billion+ mis marked tickets was 2013-2016. The only possibility: KCG. The SEC facilitated g
CM MPID is and always has been NITE. VIRT didn't trade OTCM money laundering shells prior to the SEC facilitated fraud on the public acquisition of Knight/KCG:NITE either. Then again, the SEC KNOWS exactly WHO the customer in the FINRA complaint is. They also know the stocks in the trades. So, yes: the custom
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
r the firm had acquired multiple affiliates with separate Market Participant Identifiers (MPID's) and the orders were associated with those MPID's" Bull Shit. The period covered in the complaint related to the 1.5 billion+ mis marked tickets was 2013-2016. The only possibility: KCG. The SEC facilitated g
CM MPID is and always has been NITE. VIRT didn't trade OTCM money laundering shells prior to the SEC facilitated fraud on the public acquisition of Knight/KCG:NITE either. Then again, the SEC KNOWS exactly WHO the customer in the FINRA complaint is. They also know the stocks in the trades. So, yes: the custom
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (85)
Entities connected to both Bull Shit and Knight/KCG:NITE
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
CD
Chris Dilorio
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
JA
Janey
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Audrey Strauss
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Gruntal
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Sullivan Cromwell
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Getco
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
NO
Norberg
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
UR
Urban
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Robinhood
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
BA
Bill Ackman
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
SEC FILINGS
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Mercatus
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
HP
Hester Peirce
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Market Statistics - Equity Trading Data
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
MH
Ms Hodgman/Strzok
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
Handler/JEF
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
RE
Redditt
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE
MH
Melissa Hodgman
PERSON5 w/ Bull·4 w/ Knight/KCG:NITE