Epstein Secrets

D arrested at meeting site. 03- Joesph Poignant 1 [None] Use of intemet and 13068 telephone to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 03- David Brautigam I [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20043 as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D (using 2 usernames) had sexually explicit conversation w

to the element must exist at the time of the conduct constituting the offense"); LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law §3.11(a) (West 1986) (noting that Concurrence is a basic principle of criminal law and "the better view is that there is concurrence when tke defendant's mental state actuates the physical cond

ted at meeting site. 03- 13068 Joesph Poignant 1 [None] Use of intemet and telephone to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 03- 20043 David Brautigam 1 [None] D met u/c officer (posing as 13 y.o. girl) on intemet chat service. D (using 2 usernames) had sexually explicit conversation with of

to the element must exist at the time of the conduct constituting the offense"); LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law §3.11(a) (West 1986) (noting that Concurrence is a basic principle of criminal law and "the better view is that there is concurrence when the defendant's mental state actuates the physical cond

D arrested at meeting site. 03- Joesph Poignant I [None] Use of intemet and 13068 telephone to entice minor to engage in sex activity. 03- David Brautigam I [None] D met u/c officer (posing 20043 as 13 y.o. girl) on internet chat service. D (using 2 usernames) had sexually explicit conversation

to the element must exist at the time of the conduct constituting the offense"); LaFave, Substantive Criminal Law §3.11(a) (West 1986) (noting that Concurrence is a basic principle of criminal law and "the better view is that there is concurrence when the defendant's mental state actuates the physical cond