Epstein Secrets

TATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) JOSEF. F. BOEHM, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the restitution plan in the above captioned case, the COURT

consistent with the purposes of the Plea Agreement and this Trust Agreement; (2) advising and providing guidance for the TRUSTEE; and (3) acting as an Appellate Board to hear appeals by beneficiaries regarding decisions of the TRUSTEE. Such responsibilities are not delegable to, transferable to, or exercisable by

TATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) JOSEF. F. BOEHM, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the restitution plan in the above captioned case, the COURT

consistent with the purposes of the Plea Agreement and this Trust Agreement; (2) advising and providing guidance for the TRUSTEE; and (3) acting as an Appellate Board to hear appeals by beneficiaries regarding decisions of the TRUSTEE. Such responsibilities are not delegable to, transferable to, or exercisable by

TATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) JOSEF. F. BOEHM, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the restitution plan in the above captioned case, the COURT

consistent with the purposes of the Plea Agreement and this Trust Agreement; (2) advising and providing guidance for the TRUSTEE; and (3) acting as an Appellate Board to hear appeals by beneficiaries regarding decisions of the TRUSTEE. Such responsibilities are not delegable to, transferable to, or exercisable by