Epstein Secrets

TATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) JOSEF. F. BOEHM, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the restitution plan in the above captioned case, the COURT

d faith reasonably believed by such TRUST PROTECTOR to be in accordance with the provisions and intent hereof, except for any matter involving such TRUST PROCTETOR's own willful misconduct or gross negligence proved by clear and convincing evidence, (B) the TRUST PROTECTOR shall not have any fiduciary responsib

TATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) JOSEF. F. BOEHM, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the restitution plan in the above captioned case, the COURT

d faith reasonably believed by such TRUST PROTECTOR to be in accordance with the provisions and intent hereof, except for any matter involving such TRUST PROCTETOR's own willful misconduct or gross negligence proved by clear and convincing evidence, (B) the TRUST PROTECTOR shall not have any fiduciary responsib

TATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) No. A04-003-01 CR (JWS) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ORDER ) JOSEF. F. BOEHM, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Having duly considered the government's motion setting forth the restitution plan in the above captioned case, the COURT

d faith reasonably believed by such TRUST PROTECTOR to be in accordance with the provisions and intent hereof, except for any matter involving such TRUST PROCTETOR's own willful misconduct or gross negligence proved by clear and convincing evidence, (B) the TRUST PROTECTOR shall not have any fiduciary responsib